Tuesday, August 14 , 2018, 1:40 pm | Partly Cloudy 74º

 
 
 
 

Connie Schultz: There’s No Room for Doubt on Death Row

Granting clemency is the right thing to do in the case of convicted killer Kevin Keith

One of the horrible blessings bestowed on many governors is the occasional duty to play God, one life at a time.

Connie Schultz
Connie Schultz

In Ohio, for the 28th time in less than four years, Gov. Ted Strickland must decide: Shall a man live? Or shall he die? This time, the man’s name is Kevin Keith.

Chances are, no matter where you live in America, you’ve heard about Keith. A lot of people, including a bipartisan list of 31 former judges and prosecutors across the country, have called for clemency in this case riddled with missteps and shortcuts on the road to justice.

Keith was convicted and sentenced to death in 1994 for a shooting spree in Bucyrus, Ohio, that killed three people, including a 4-year-old child, and wounded three others, including a 6-year-old girl. Keith has insisted he is innocent. The Ohio Parole Board recently voted unanimously to deny clemency.

His execution is scheduled for Sept. 15. Gov. Strickland must decide by 9:59 that morning whether he will grant a reprieve. But there is no need to wait until then to do the right thing. Doubts hover over Keith’s murder conviction like low storm clouds ready to burst.

The primary evidence against Keith was eyewitness testimony, which numerous studies — and hundreds of exonerations — have shown to be the least reliable. The Innocence Project, which works to free those imprisoned for crimes they did not commit, says that eyewitness misidentification played a role in more than 75 percent of the 258 convictions overturned through DNA testing.

Gov. Strickland, who already has said publicly that Keith’s case “has circumstances that” he finds “troubling,” said in a phone interview recently that eyewitness testimony is often deeply flawed.

“As a psychologist, I know that eyewitness testimony tends to be among the least credible,” he said, “and yet it also tends to be the most powerful in its impact on a jury. We’ve already seen cases in Ohio and across the country where people were exonerated after being convicted primarily on eyewitness testimony.”

There are numerous other reasons to believe that Keith is innocent, including the discovery of new evidence, police missteps, the existence of another known suspect and lousy defense work during Keith’s trial. But it is clear that prosecutors not only don’t care whether Keith is innocent but also are deeply invested in winning at all costs.

Consider, for example, how the state, in a written argument to the parole board, altered 6-year-old Quanita Reeves’ response after police showed her a six-photo lineup in which Keith’s photo stands out. It is so dark that features are difficult to discern; his face is larger than the others’, and he is the only one who is bald.

“Quanita pointed to photo No. 5, Keith, and stated it ‘looks like him,’ but the man she saw did not have a ‘bump on his head.’”

According to a transcript of that taped interview provided by the Attorney General’s Office, here’s what Quanita really said: “But that looks like him, but that not him though.” The italicized part is what the state deleted.

Quanita also said, repeatedly, that the guy who shot her did not have a lump on his head like the one visible on the top of Keith’s. (Today Quanita says Keith was her shooter.)

I asked Ted Hart, spokesman for the Ohio attorney general, why the state altered Quanita’s statement. His initial response, via e-mail: “We quoted from the interview transcript and also provided the entire transcript for context.”

When I pressed him about altering her quote for the written argument, he responded: “The quote was not altered. It was summarized.”

Such a brazen attempt to manipulate witness testimony and then wiggle out of owning it casts a tall shadow on prosecutors’ credibility.

To quote Gov. Strickland: “If that happened, it is terribly, terribly disturbing.”

A lot of people are praying that justice will prevail for Keith, but his earthly fate rests in the hands of just one man. Only Gov. Strickland can do the right thing.

Serious questions remain in this case. Where there is doubt, there must be mercy.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. E-mail her at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >