Pixel Tracker

Sunday, February 17 , 2019, 4:19 pm | Partly Cloudy 56º


Capps, Farr Host Community Forum on Hydraulic Fracturing of Oil in Santa Barbara County

At the center of the forum is federal legislation that would require companies to disclose chemicals used in their operations

Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, and Santa Barbara County 3rd District Supervisor Doreen Farr hosted a panel discussion Thursday night at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History in light of congressional legislation that would require energy companies to disclose the chemicals used in their hydraulic fracturing operations.

Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase the effectiveness of oil and gas wells by injecting fluid at high pressures. The fluid is mostly water with a small percentage of chemicals that differ from company to company.

The method has caused concerns over groundwater and surface water contamination and general public health, especially since oil and gas companies are not required to disclose which chemicals they are injecting into the ground.

The bill, the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (or FRAC Act), would also repeal fracking’s exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act, through what Capps called the “Halliburton loophole.”

Santa Barbara County residents and elected officials have been concerned about hydraulic fracturing since an unpermitted drilling operation was discovered in Los Alamos. Venoco Inc. didn’t think a permit was required, but county officials require Oil Drilling and Production Plan permits, which include going through an environmental review process and getting Planning Commission approval, according to Doug Anthony, deputy director of the county’s energy division.

For a small community such as Los Alamos, the aquifer is the one and only source of public water, so contamination would have disastrous consequences.

Bob Field, president of the Santa Ynez Rancho Estates Mutual Water Company, put the dilemma in perspective. Without knowing what the chemicals are, he said, water companies can’t know whether they are testing for them.

“If a chemical is not lawful to be in groundwater, then why is it lawful to inject it into the ground?” he said.

The California Department of Conservation has the authority to regulate fracking, but has neither the methods nor funding in place to do it, said Marni Weber, assistant director of the Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources.

It’s considered a “well stimulus,” and without the requirement to report it, the state doesn’t know how much of it is happening, she said. There is a voluntary registration site, where several companies have registered chemicals used in specific wells, but there is no information regarding Santa Barbara County operations.

Weber said the geographical uniqueness of each state should be considered with regulation and that research should be done to see if fracking has any impact on seismic activity. Local regulations for drilling and regulation is a good way to do that, she added.

Environmental Defense Center attorney Brian Segee said the uncertain types of toxic chemicals put in the ground are concerning, as is the large amount of fresh water used in the operations. In Venoco’s wells near Los Alamos, he said, 100,000 gallons were used for each injection of fluid.

Waste transport, the potential for spills, and the impacts on surrounding wildlife and air quality are other concerns that can’t be addressed while the existing laws have so many loopholes, Segee said.

Energy industry representative Tupper Hull said existing regulations are “robust” and that hydraulic fracturing operations are a “breathtaking improvement” toward an energy-independent future for the United States. Hull, the strategic communications vice president for the Western States Petroleum Association, said the method has been used since the 1940s, mostly as a method to enhance recovery of crude oil, and hasn’t been found harmful to the environment.

The industry supports disclosing chemicals used as long as trade secrets are protected, as specific “recipes” can give companies an advantage over others, Hull said. There was support by oil and gas companies for Assembly Bill 591, now stalled in committees, that would require the disclosure of a well’s history and chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing.

To that, Field said the public needs to know what to test for in water resources, not the chemical recipe.

Los Alamos resident Chris Wrather, who lives on and owns a thoroughbred horse farm, said locals are uneasy with the technology. He said regulation is essential to avoid the public taking all the risk while companies make profits.

If the aquifer was contaminated, “it would be game over,” he said. “Our business would be worthless, our land would be worthless and we would have to move.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Energy & Commerce Committee Hydraulic Fracturing Report


Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >