Monday, July 23 , 2018, 8:26 am | Fair 74º

 
 
 
 

Diane Dimond: Playing Poker Shouldn’t Be a Crime — But It Is

Passage of the Internet Poker Act for Americans would be a win-win

The Great American pastime isn’t just one thing, it is lots of things. There is the game of baseball. There’s eating apple pie. And there is poker. It is the card game played by millions of Americans in nearly every community in every state of the union.

The first two activities are perfectly legal, but poker? Well, that depends on where you play the game — at a card table or via the Internet — and the state in which you live.

I have such fond memories of playing poker that I can’t imagine why some states still have laws labeling it as illegal gambling. When I was a kid growing up in Albuquerque, my cash-strapped parents often had friends over for a rousing poker game. They threw modest New Year’s Eve parties where two-bit limit poker games were the centerpiece. After I moved out on my own, playing poker was a fun and inexpensive way to make new friends and interact with colleagues outside work.

Well now, for the very first time, a federal judge in Brooklyn, N.Y., has ruled on the legality of poker and come down squarely on the side of card players. Hooray for Judge Jack Weinstein, who ruled that poker is a game of skill not a game of chance. Therefore, he proclaimed in a lengthy opinion, it cannot be considered illegal gambling. I hope the word spreads far and wide.

Weinstein wrote, “Expert poker players draw on an array of talents, including facility with numbers, knowledge of human psychology, and power of observation and deception.” And, as if equating continued poker playing to on-the-job training, he pointed out: “Players can use these skills to win, even if chance has not dealt them the better hand. The most skillful professionals earn the same celestial salaries as professional ballplayers.”

Weinstein’s decision stemmed from the case of Lawrence DiCristina, 33, who hosted regular Texas hold ‘em poker games in a space in Staten Island, N.Y. He was convicted of operating an illegal gambling house because he took 5 percent off the top to cover his expenses (rent, staff salaries, etc.). Weinstein overturned DiCristina’s conviction, saying that the defendant’s activity was simply not covered by the federal anti-gambling law. He added that the nation’s gambling statutes were aimed at organized crime rings, not a mom-and-pop operation like DiCristina’s.

Think of it like another game of skill — chess — where the winner gets to take home an upfront bet. Chess players don’t win because they got lucky. They win because they have the experience and expertise to beat their opponent. It’s all about the skill.

Weinstein’s 120-page decision is sure to be quoted in future poker-related legal cases at both the federal and state level, especially now with the boon of Internet play that falls into a legal gray area. Internet sites scream about how perfectly legal they are, but it just isn’t so.

“None of it has been specifically authorized by any level of government,” said John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, which boasts more than 1 million members and is working for uniform laws. “Just like everything else we do ... like books and movies, the poker player is turning to the Internet for entertainment in record numbers.”

An attorney involved in the DiCristina case told me that, depending on the state, a citizen’s friendly Friday night poker game could be the target of a police raid. Many of the mish-mash of state laws have never been tested — in New Mexico and Utah, to name two. In Washington state, however, it’s a class 3 felony to wager online — poker or any other game.

Nevada and Delaware are just the opposite. Those states passed laws making it legal for residents to play intra-state poker games once the Internet operator is licensed and taxed. The state of Missouri also expressly recognizes poker as a game of skill but only licenses it for play on riverboats, although at least one location is on dry land and not a boat at all.

For the time being, playing poker in South Carolina is OK, but the state’s Supreme Court is now reviewing a pro-Texas hold ‘em decision, so that could change.

In Ohio, playing poker is still not considered a skill and is lumped in with other “games of chanc,” like craps and roulette, and declared illegal. (Interestingly, bingo is not included as one of the banned games.) See what I mean about a mish-mash of different laws?

California seems to be the prototype for what the Poker Players Alliance would like to see. There are huge card clubs in the state that are licensed and regulated, and bring in much-needed tax dollars for the state. Operators and customers are happy, and the state can rely on a steady stream of income.

Lawmakers need to get anti-gambling laws out of the 19th century, when they were first conceived. A great first step would be to pass the Internet Poker Act for Americans (H.R. 2366), which is pending in the House of Representatives and allows states to opt out if they want.

The bill was introduced by Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, who says, “To put it simply, this bill is about having the personal freedom to play a skill-based game you enjoy without fear of breaking the law.”

Sounds like an all-around win-win to me.

Diane Dimond is the author of Cirque Du Salahi: Be Careful Who You Trust. Click here for more information. She can be contacted at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >