Pixel Tracker

Monday, February 18 , 2019, 7:14 am | Fair 44º

 
 
 
 

Santa Barbara Council Votes for Resolution Favoring Oil Moratorium

The 5-1 vote followed more than an hour of impassioned testimony on both sides of the issue.

After listening to more than an hour of impassioned testimony from members of the public on both sides of the issue, the Santa Barbara City Council on Tuesday voted 5-1 in support of a symbolic resolution that favors keeping in place the state and federal moratorium on new leases for oil drilling off the coast of Santa Barbara.

Presented to the council by Mayor Marty Blum and council members Das Williams and Helene Schneider, the resolution was meant to counterbalance another symbolic statement made by the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, which last month sent the opposite message in a 3-2 vote to send Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger a letter requesting that he support lifting the ban, saying it would help lower gas prices and reduce America’s dependency on foreign oil, as well as generate revenue for the county.

Councilman Dale Francisco cast the lone no vote, and Councilman Roger Horton — who said he favors the resolution — was absent.

Among the people who spoke from the pro-drilling perspective was Bruce Allen of the group S.O.S. (Stop Oil Seeps) California. Allen argued that lifting the ban and allowing more drilling would improve the environment by reducing the amount of oil that for centuries has been seeping from the ocean floor naturally.

“We are not saying you can completely eliminate it,” he said, “but we do believe you can reduce it.”

Allen also argued that lifting the ban could allow Santa Barbara County to reap up to $330 million annually in royalties.

Among those who spoke in support of maintaining the moratorium was Dave Davis of the local nonprofit Community Environmental Council. Davis said the United States needs to break its addiction to oil, and — given a newfound worldwide phenomenon in which demand is outstripping supply – is running out of time.

“By 2030, we will need 9.5 new Saudi Arabias to maintain the oil addiction we have today,” he said. “Offshore drilling is a distraction from getting to the real business of moving this country into a new technological frontier of renewable energy.”

Blum said the push for more drilling in coastal waters is disingenuous.

“To say that we are completely against any oil drilling — if you sit at almost any house in Santa Barbara and look at the ocean you see oil drilling out there,” she said. “We have an oil processing plant on the coast that’s not even being used.

“I just think that the reason has to do with the presidential election coming up, and it really truly bothers me that we are trying to make this into a very political argument.”

Williams referred to more drilling as “a bridge to nowhere.”

“The future is going to be in alternatives,” he said.

Williams added that he respects how the oil industry was once a major foundation of the South Coast’s middle class.

“I believe that energy can once again be a foundation of the middle class, but it’s not going to be in oil,” he said.

Francisco said he believed the council was acting with undue haste on a topic that is enormously complex.

“Even though it’s a symbolic action, I’d like it to be a well-considered action,” he said. “I don’t think putting it on the agenda with one week’s notice does justice to this topic.”

Noozhawk staff writer Rob Kuznia can be reached at [email protected]

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.