Pixel Tracker

Friday, March 22 , 2019, 4:34 am | Fair 48º


David Harsanyi: There’s No Need to Get Personal

Politicos' tendency to personalize a debate can — and most likely will — backfire

A few years ago, I asked a political operative what he did for a living — as the answer is often less obvious than you imagine.

David Harsanyi
David Harsanyi

“We isolate an issue,” he explained. “Then we isolate the enemy, and we try to destroy them.”

If given a chance, politicos will almost always opt to personalize a debate. Case in point: the White House’s nonstop efforts to convince voters that Rep. John Boehner is really some kind of Sith Lord. (As if we needed to be convinced.)

Sometimes, though, it can backfire. And if Republicans begin incorporating the festering obsession with President Barack Obama’s birthplace, loyalties, origins or religion into their official argument, they will have blown it.

Take the tortured contention of noted conservative author Dinesh D’Souza. In a recent Forbes cover story, “How Obama Thinks,” he blames the president’s “odd” blame-America-first, redistributionist behavior on his Kenyan father’s long-lost anti-colonial philosophy.

Conservatives have an opening to make an uncluttered argument — using the empirical data of a terrible economy — that less spending, less regulation and less government is the way to create more prosperity. Dragging Third World colonialism into it — and I can say this with near certitude — is a bad idea on a number of levels.

To begin with, no decent TV-watching American has the faintest clue what you’re talking about. And worse, the spurious claims about rampant right-wing racism will now gain fresh traction. That is, I’m afraid to say, the byproduct of bringing Kenyan politics into a perfectly constructive debate about how terrible this administration has been.

This fact is obvious to all Republicans, right?

“What if (Obama) is so outside our comprehension that only if you understand Kenyan anti-colonial behavior can you begin to piece together (his actions)?” Newt Gingrich, highly impressed by D’Souza’s essay, explained to National Review Online. “That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.”

Is President Obama really outside your sphere of comprehension? To say you need a predictor to decode his next move is to say that the president is offering us something more than the hard-left agenda the Democratic Party had promised — rather unambiguously — when it came to power.

President Obama’s policies are no more exotic than those of the nearest progressive academic, the angry, union-shilling, purple-shirted sign waver or New York Times editorial board member. There is no whodunit when it comes to “fair trade” or “social justice.” There is nothing novel about embracing illiberal “friends” abroad. Nothing unique about redistributive economics or regulatory dictatorships.

It’s all standard. And until recently, much of it politically unpalatable.

What about the fellow travelers who voted lock step with the president? Obama didn’t write policy that nationalizes health care or bails out states.

Has there been an outbreak of Kenyan anti-colonialist sentiment I’m unaware of?

To psychoanalyze the man’s ideological origins and concoct theories is to attach much more credit to these policies than they deserve.

Maybe there is a more obvious answer. President Obama’s political behavior might be alien to common sense and good government, but it’s not alien to the United States.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of Nanny State. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.