Thursday, November 15 , 2018, 1:11 pm | Fair 77º

 
 
 
 

Goleta Council Votes to Put City Hall Project on Hold

Amid economic and other financial uncertainties, city leaders opt not to move forward yet with purchasing a permanent facility

After hours of discussion and debate, the Goleta City Council on Tuesday evening voted to deny a proposed City Hall project it had been pursuing for about two years.

The 4-1 vote, with Councilman Eric Onnen dissenting, was made “without prejudice,” meaning the project on the table at Tuesday’s meeting still may be a possibility pending other alternatives the council directed the staff to research. Also included in the decision was direction to enhance the city’s reserve fund for a new City Hall.

The council’s action was another in a series of hesitations motivated by caution over the several million dollars involved in the search for a permanent City Hall. The city pays about $445,000 a year in rent for its digs at 130 Cremona Drive, and the move toward a permanent public facility has been a goal since the adoption of the General Plan in 2006.

However, amid a sluggish economy, a decrease in revenues, an ongoing tax-sharing agreement with the county and uncertainty over future earnings, the council decided not to pull the trigger quite yet on an updated City Hall proposal.

“I have to say with regret that I am unable to support going ahead with this project,” said Councilwoman Margaret Connell, pointing out the loss of vehicle license fees as well as the drop in transient occupancy tax and sales tax revenue.

Onnen attempted to push his colleagues out of what he saw as “a natural pullback.”

“What happens in these times because of these economic challenges is that there is a natural pullback,” he said, calling the hesitation a “fear reflex.”

“What do you do with that reflex? You gather information, you ask questions, you consider scenarios,” Onnen said.

If the economy wasn’t enough, among other things the city has faced in its two-year search for a City Hall has been the lack of available buildings, as well as the quality of the buildings.

“There’s not a lot out there,” City Manager Dan Singer said.

According to consultant Francois DeJohn, the scarcity of buildings that come up for sale made it difficult to find a building of the Class A quality sought by the city. In addition, the city isn’t poised to easily purchase Class B buildings and upgrade them, with competition such as UCSB looking for commercial real estate, too. The best option the city has, DeJohn said, would be to build its own facility.

The proposed City Hall would have been located in what’s called “Building 2” at Cabrillo Business Park (the old Delco property), 6767 Hollister Ave., between Los Carneros and Storke roads. The building is part of a larger complex included in the ongoing development of the South Coast’s largest business park.

At a planned size of two stories and 40,000 square feet, the building would have been nearly double the city’s current needs. But the plan had been to rent out the upper floor to recoup some of the nearly $14.5 million the city projects it would have had to spend to purchase the property and improve the building to make it a public facility.

The purchase agreement included a $4 million upfront deposit to escrow, $2.2 million in property improvements to be made by the city, a $500,000 discount for upfront partial financing and another $550,000 credit if the city had waived development impact fees for the project. The facility would have been paid for with a combination of reserve money, development impact fees and bonds.

Had the council approved the agreement and moved forward with the purchase, the estimated move-in date for the facility would have been in the summer of 2011.

The staff financial analysis says the city would have seen benefits to cash flow almost immediately after moving into the building. By 2040, the city was projected to be ahead by $26 million plus ownership of a 40,000-square-foot building, although, according to Singer, the cumulative cash benefit would not have been evident until about 2030. According to the staff’s worst-case scenario, assuming no renters were found for the second floor, the city still would have been ahead by $10 million by 2040, plus ownership.

Some people still weren’t so sure it was a great deal.

“At a time when employees are being laid off, positions not filled, hours and wages cut, and services, including library hours and park maintenance, drastically cut, it seems inappropriate for the city to spend $14 million on a building, especially one that’s too large and not built to be a City Hall,” Goleta resident Barbara Massey said.

Richard Temple, on the other hand, favored the purchase.

“From the information I’ve seen, this is going to be a very positive move from a fiscal standpoint,” he said, adding that the location was convenient and offered good visibility.

For city staff, it might be something like going back to the drawing board, as they consider alternatives to the proposed project. At least one option the city has is to stay and renegotiate another lease agreement with Bermant Development Co., owner of the Cremona building.

Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >