Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 2:23 am | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Mona Charen: Good Riddance to the Pelosi Era

Wasteful stimulus and health-care bills passed under the House speaker's leadership

Her opponent grabbed his 15 minutes of fame by depicting House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the Wicked Witch of the West in a campaign spot — a sophomoric attempt at humor that accomplished nothing except to generate sympathy for its target.

Mona Charen
Mona Charen

Not that Pelosi deserves kid gloves — far from it. She, even more than President Barack Obama, is the spirit of the age in which we live. It is her legislation, her attitudes and her legacy on which we will vote a month from now. Her effect on the nation has been enormous. And while it’s doubtful that even Moses could defeat her in California’s 8th District (maybe especially not Moses), her record deserves the right kind of scorn, not a cartoon.

Speaker Pelosi, more than anyone else, is responsible for the $800 billion stimulus bill. Placed in charge of boosting the economy by the new president, Pelosi essentially dumped the contents of her “in” box into legislation. Pretty much everything that any Democratic member of Congress, big city mayor or liberal governor had ever asked for was enacted. It was urgent after all.

Pelosi explained that, “Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs. I don’t think we can go fast enough to stop that.”

So we wound up with, among so many other projects, $15 billion for Pell grant scholarships (which make college more expensive), $1 billion for “community development block grants” (pork for cities), $145 billion for “making work pay” tax credits and $83 billion for the earned income tax credit (income transfers), $89 billion for Medicaid (more income transfers), $36 billion for unemployment benefits (ditto), $20 billion for food stamps (ditto), $30 billion for COBRA insurance extension (ditto), $79 billion for the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (rewarding states that overspent at the expense of more frugal ones), $4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities” (we can only guess), and assorted special interest goodies such as $400 million for global warming research, $150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees and farm-raised fish,” $335 million for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and $55 million for the Historic Preservation Fund.

Shockingly enough, the bill failed to keep unemployment below 8 percent as promised. But when, in July, she agitated for even more unemployment spending, she explained it this way: Unemployment checks “create jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name. ... it injects demand into the economy.” She seems actually to believe this. It’s one thing to argue that in the name of compassion you must extend unemployment benefits, but to suggest that by taking from one pocket (the taxpayers’) and giving to another you are helping the net economy, well, it defies logic.

Under her leadership, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a devastatingly wasteful, bureaucratic nightmare of health-care reform (later scrapped in favor of the U.S. Senate version). The final legislation aggravates every problem with our existing health-care system (excessive bureaucracy, third-party payer incentives, costly insurance mandates, lack of competition) and adds new burdens and mandates of dubious legality. In her defense, the speaker probably hasn’t read it. After all, she argued that Congress would “have to pass the bill (to) find out what’s in it.”

The woman who explained that she invested in natural gas because “I believe in natural gas as a clean, cheap alternative to fossil fuels” also shepherded passage of cap-and-trade energy legislation that would, according to a Heritage Foundation analysis, cost every American family of four $6,800 annually by 2035.

Pelosi has done more than quick-march the nation toward bankruptcy, though. She also has contributed to the atmosphere of hostility and menace toward business that has kept capital spooked and arguably delayed the economic recovery. Businessmen are her favorite pinatas. During the health-care debate, she characterized health insurance companies as the “villains” who have “had a good thing going for a long time at the expense of the American people and the health of our country.” They were “immoral,” she added.

Last week, offering her beleaguered colleagues advice on how to win re-election as they limp out of Washington without having passed a budget or preserved the Bush tax cuts for anyone, she suggested her default tactic: “Now our challenge is to tattoo the practices of big insurance, big oil, big banks and the rest” onto Republicans. “And our members feel very good about doing that.”

What an epitaph.

Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >