Wednesday, November 14 , 2018, 8:23 pm | Fair 52º


Jim Hightower: Goofing Up Health-Care Reform

Lightweight Montana Sen. Max Baucus isn't the right person to oversee the heavy job

America’s shouting match over health-care reform has turned completely goofy — and I’m not talking about confused seniors at teabag rallies getting red-faced with anger after being told by the right-wing scare machine that “government is trying to taker over Medicare.” No, I’m talking about our U.S. senators.

Take Max Baucus. Please! He’s the lightweight Montana Democrat to whom President Barack Obama entrusted the heavy job of shepherding health-care reform through the upper chamber. It was like asking Tweety Bird to lift a bowling ball.

Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower

Baucus is chairman of the finance committee. The what? Excuse me, but why wouldn’t the health committee be the appropriate venue for taking the lead on, you know, health reform? I mean, we don’t submit banking legislation to the health panel, so ...

Nonetheless, there it was, and Baucus rather goofily began the process by cheerfully chirping that he was discarding any consideration of the one straightforward and popular reform that would actually work: the single-payer system of insurance, which more appropriately should be called “Medicare for all.”

This easy-to-grasp approach would be a boon to us patients, doctors and taxpayers, with only the greed-fueled insurance companies and rip-off drug companies getting a comeuppance. But, no go from the chairman — who, coincidentally, has received nearly $600,000 from insurance drug companies and hospitals in the past two years and has gleefully continued to collect beaucoup bucks from them this year, even as he has been writing legislation that bases “reform” on their selfish profit interests.

Baucus, backed by unanimous and enthusiastic support from Republicans on his committee, has merrily jettisoned reform after reform that the industry opposed.

For example, an amendment to require drug-price discounts for low-income seniors with multiple chronic illnesses: killed. The provision to include a nonprofit, public-insurance option to increase competition, provide consumer choice and keep insurance corporations honest: gone.

To explain such spectacular servitude to the special interests by a Democrat who should be expected to stand for the interests of ordinary folks, the milquetoast chairman simply stated that his goal was to produce a bill that could win the industry’s support and get the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster.

That’s his goal? If the meek ever inherit the Earth, Baucus will be a land baron! Why isn’t it his goal to produce the best health care there is for all of the American people? Why has he empowered Republicans (who — remember? — lost the White House and Senate last year) to control the terms of the debate and the content of the Democrat’s bill?

Why doesn’t he take a couple of testosterone shots and reach out to the 65 percent of Americans (including 47 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of doctors) who support the public-insurance option, rallying them and some of his own weak-kneed Democratic colleagues to kick the selfish health-insurance lobbyists right in the butt?

It was not so long ago that Montana sent people such as Mike Mansfield and Lee Metcalf to the U.S. Senate — real Democrats of stature who didn’t suck up to lobbyists and run scared of Republicans. One has to ask: Is Baucus really from Montana?

The Republicans he seeks to satisfy are ideological goofballs such as Iowa’s Sen. Chuck Grassley, who wails that a nonprofit public-insurance option would offer better deals to consumers than the mingy, exorbitantly expensive health-care policies sold by the monopolistic insurance giants.

That’s unfair, he cried. The public-insurance plan, the clueless Grassley complained, would not pay excessive salaries and bonuses to top executives, would not rake off billions of dollars in profit and would not retain massive bureaucracies whose sole purpose is to try to keep from covering treatments that our doctors provide.

With no need to pamper executives, put profits above patients and stiff policy holders, sobbed the senator, the public plan would upset the industry’s competitive balance.

Exactly! And that’s why we consumers want and need the honest competition that the public-insurance option could provide.

Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.