Monday, April 23 , 2018, 8:28 am | Fog/Mist 56º


Local News

Candidate Forum: Goleta City Council

The Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce plays host to a discussion on growth, housing and the economy.

The candidates for Goleta City Council — Ed Easton, Jean Blois, Margaret Connell and Don Gilman — were interviewed at a forum luncheon Wednesday by the Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce on issues nearest and dearest to the local business community.

Except for a heated exchange at the end between Connell and chamber member Tim Mahoney, reminiscent of the bad blood between the city and the chamber during the first years of incorporation, the forum went smoothly, as the candidates outlined their positions, priorities, explanations of the past and strategies for the future.

The city’s General Plan dominated the conversation, with all candidates pledging to work toward the completion of Goleta’s development blueprint, as well as the associated zoning ordinances and coastal land use plan.

How they would like the plan to look differed between the panelists. Slow-growth candidates Connell and Easton worried about the environmental protections they said were being eroded via the ongoing General Plan amendments, while chamber-backed candidates Blois and Gilman praised the changes as tools that would make the plan better.

“I do not believe we are changing the General Plan willy-nilly,” Blois said. “There are about 700 policies in the General Plan, and 77 of them have been questioned.”

On the topic of affordable housing required by the state, Connell, who was once part of the team that put the Housing Element together, and Easton defended the decision to put the units along the Hollister corridor at a density of 20 units per acre.

“If anybody wants to challenge the 20 to the acre, I would challenge them to say where they would want to put those 2,388 units,” said Connell, pointing out that other options involved rezoning agricultural lands, such as Bishop Ranch, for development, a plan once supported by the chamber before the developer withdrew his application earlier this year.

Meanwhile, Blois expressed reservations about rezoning the Hollister corridor properties to residential. Gilman, for his part, refused to pass judgment on the notion, saying he has seen good and bad designs at that density, and it mattered on a case-by case basis.

The local economy was also on the minds of the candidates, given the projected downturn in the city’s budget.

Blois, Connell and Easton acknowledged the first council’s efforts to save for the upcoming three-year rainy day, when one of Goleta’s funding sources from the state dries up and before one of the conditions in the revenue-neutrality agreement between the city and the county backs down. Reserves notwithstanding, Blois, Connell and Gilman said that one of the things they would aim to do is get the tax-sharing agreement with the county revised to be less onerous to the city. 

“I keep beating that drum because that drives so much of what we’re able to do as a city,” Gilman said. The agreement takes about $8.2 million out of a $15 million city budget while it still has to pay $6 million for public safety services from the county, he said.

To create a mutually beneficial relationship between the city and the local business community, a relationship that was once very contentious because of differences in matters of growth and development, Blois, Connell and Gilman agreed that supporting startups, particularly the kind of tech ventures spun off by UCSB, was the way to go.

Easton added that the city and business community should share more information to help decide exactly what kind of business could flourish in the local economy without hurting others, and that slow growth was still necessary. 

“We need to contain the growth so the infrastructure we have could support your businesses,” he said.

Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at [email protected]

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >