Tuesday, February 20 , 2018, 7:44 pm | Fair 49º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Committee Moves to Craft Revised Medical-Marijuana Ordinance

City staff will write up a draft using recommendations discussed during the past few months

Tangible progress was made at Tuesday’s Ordinance Committee meeting regarding the city’s medical-marijuana dispensary ordinance.

Councilmen Das Williams, Dale Francisco and Grant House directed staff to craft a revised ordinance with their new recommendations, which have been discussed during the past few months. City Attorney Stephen Wiley said a draft most likely would be ready in two to three weeks.

The committee has had difficulty with its task, given the legal status of medical marijuana and the interpretation of state laws.

Earlier this week, the Obama administration announced that the federal government would leave medical-marijuana decisions up to the states, and that properly operated storefront-type collectives might be legal.

The interpretation of California’s laws, including the storefront vs. collective model, will be one of the items up for discussion when the ordinance is tackled by the City Council. For now, the committee’s task was to revise the ordinance, which allows dispensaries under city law.

Francisco and the Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse are among those in the community who support an outright ban on dispensaries.

“The dispensary model just grew up on its own,” he said. “We’re under no compulsion to go against state law; in fact, it’s just the opposite. Dispensaries violate state law, in my opinion.”

For Santa Barbara residents, main concerns regarding dispensaries have been location, proliferation and the misuse of products.

Recommendations included a citywide cap of seven dispensaries, with one per specified region. The option to expand zoning availability to C-0 and C-1 zones was not included.

“Before we expand, we want to constrain until we get it right,” Williams said.

Including a 1,000-foot dispensary-free zone around Casa Esperanza was included, acknowledging the area as special needs, though the proposed Milpas Recovery Zone doesn’t yet exist.

“At least in the immediate vicinity, there will be no temptation there,” Francisco said.

The regulation of dispensaries and enforcement of those that are illegal or nonconforming was addressed in the form of increased security requirements.

Committee members suggested providing dispensaries with a banned list of known resellers, and having the option to shut down the facility if people sell to those on the list. The Santa Barbara School District has been vocal about concerns with patients reselling or dispensaries directly providing products to students.

An added tool for enforcing operational requirements would be yearly reviews, conducted jointly by the Santa Barbara Police Department and the Planning Division’s staff hearing officer.

Armando Martel of the police department said its new computer system flags dispensary-related incidents now, in order to get better statistics and see if crime problems are real or perceived.

The amount of time existing nonconforming dispensaries have to comply or close down may change to six months from the date of the ordinance’s adoption. In addition, it has been recommended that the staff hearing officer, who reviews applications, get more discretion in deciding the possible negative effects of a dispensary.

Committee members also recommended that appeals continue to go through the Planning Commission, and that applications provide full cost recovery for the city.

“If we create the ordinance correctly, we should provide better guidance and shouldn’t need to make it a policy decision every time,” Williams said.

While dispensary owners may breathe easier knowing that the federal government won’t be as interested in their facilities, they’re facing more challenges as Santa Barbara’s ordinance gets tighter.

A ban on dispensaries in existing mixed-use buildings has been one of the most talked about issues during the meetings.

The conditionally approved dispensary at Paseo Chapala has been the lightening rod for the debate, as it would reside below dozens of condominiums.

Applicant JoAnna LaForce of The Farmacy could be denied her permit, as the Planning Commission appeal hearing isn’t scheduled until December.

Residents of West Hollywood, where another Farmacy is located, spoke on behalf of the facility and its problem-free past.

Existing mixed-use buildings with condominiums for sale, as of the adoption date, would be off-limits, making The Farmacy nonconforming. As of now, it’s the only dispensary, approved or in the process, in danger of being affected by the requirement.

The rationale behind it is that the building’s covenants, conditions and restrictions have been long established and didn’t plan for dispensaries being a possible commercial tenant. Paseo Chapala residents have turned out to every meeting opposing The Farmacy.

“I think it’s pretty clear people don’t want to live where dispensaries are,” resident Jeff Roland said.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >