Sunday, February 18 , 2018, 11:37 pm | Fair 52º


Susan Estrich: Palin Is Still Out of Her League

McCain did himself no favors with his choice for a running mate.

For years I’ve been dining out on the story of the 1988 vice-presidential debate, where Sen. Lloyd Bentsen literally cleaned Sen. Dan Quayle’s clock — “You’re no Jack Kennedy” — resulting in a huge increase in his own approval ratings and virtually no bump at all for the Dukakis-Bentsen ticket.

Susan Estrich
Susan Estrich
Quayle and Vice President Spiro T. Agnew have long been Exhibits A and B buttressing the conventional wisdom that people vote for president, not vice president; that having the better candidate for the No. 2 slot is all but irrelevant to winning the election; and that anytime you see one of those “who would you rather have a heartbeat away from the presidency” ads, it’s an almost certain sign that the campaign running it is a heartbeat away from defeat.

Most of the time, the interest in the vice-presidential nominee peaks in the hours leading up to the announcement. The minute we know who it is, we — the media, the country and, especially, the voters — lose interest.

So it was for Vice President-elect Joe Biden. The run-up to President-elect Barack Obama running-mate announcement had the media in a frenzy. Far-fetched rumors were flying. Then the announcement was made, and that was that. Sure, Biden. Right. Did anyone vote for Obama because of Biden? Maybe not. Then again, did anyone vote against him because of Biden? Why would they? A perfect vice-presidential selection.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was another story. Her selection, and this election, may change forever the conventional wisdom about vice-presidential nominees. Whether a good choice can help you remains to be established; my Bentsen story may still be controlling on that issue. But it should now be clear that a bad choice — and Palin was most certainly a bad choice — can do great harm to a presidential campaign.

The fact that Sen. John McCain’s top people are talking out of school about Palin’s weaknesses is a sign of just how bad a choice she was. She hurt them. She should not escape unscathed. They are clearly angry.

Palin has denied that she demanded the fancy clothes. It doesn’t matter. If she had proved herself to be up to the job, no one would care so much about her clothes. She has also denied that she was confused about whether Africa was a country or a continent, and about which countries were part of the Nicolas Sarkozy impersonator, even in her denunciation of her Republican critics as “jerks” and her effort to rehabilitate herself with Greta Van Susteren, it is that she had no business being on a national ticket.

I don’t know whether she was just too arrogant to realize she needed help before facing Couric, as her critics allege. I don’t know if the fact of the call with the Canadian comedian was a staff error. But it’s her voice sounding like an idiot talking to the pseudo-French president. She was the one who couldn’t name a Supreme Court case other than Roe, much less point to a single newspaper that she reads. The Palin who whines to Greta that she just doesn’t know how the “top echelon” of campaigns work is best off not finding out. If she is the future of the Republican Party, then Democrats can rejoice because it means the Republicans have no future.

Ultimately, the denunciation of Palin by McCain’s staffers calls into question McCain’s judgment in choosing her, which is why he had to stop it. A 72-year-old candidate, especially a maverick who has spent his life fighting for principle, might have been expected to exercise greater care in selecting his No. 2. Behind in the polls at the time, McCain made a political decision instead of a principled one, a candidate’s choice instead of a president’s.

To be fair, he probably didn’t know Palin well enough to grasp how hopelessly unqualified she was. She might have been a star in the rough, smarter than anyone could have known, able to rise to the occasion. But she wasn’t. She isn’t.

It may be that the economy was too big a hurdle for McCain to overcome, even with a more qualified running mate. But the fact that his choice of Palin almost certainly contributed to his defeat is, in the long run, an important lesson of this election. Vice presidents should matter. And the only way they will is if would-be presidents understand the limits of my old Bentsen story. Palin should ensure that.

Best-selling author Susan Estrich is the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >