Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, March 26 , 2019, 2:07 am | Fair 50º

 
 
 
 

Goleta Council Votes to Rescind Proposal to Detach from GWSD

City officials cite unfinished business that needs to be resolved before proceeding with hearings

A rather short discussion Tuesday marked the suspension of a rather protracted battle over the City of Goleta’s proposed detachment from the Goleta West Sanitary District.

The Goleta City Council voted to rescind the resolution it approved more than a year ago to pursue the detachment of parcels within the city limits served by GWSD from the special district, citing pending issues.

Nearly two years ago, the city announced its intentions to take under its wing the sanitation responsibilities for the parcels generally west of Los Carneros Road in Goleta. As it is, the city is served by two sanitary districts, with discrepancies in rates and differences in funding. GWSD existed before the passage of Proposition 13, which means it collects property taxes in addition to the user fees it charges.

The reason the city gave for this attempt was to better protect the money collected by the district from the state, and to level the playing field with the Goleta Sanitary District, which serves the east side of town.

GWSD board members were leery of the move, which would take out a significant portion of their revenue and jurisdiction, saying the city was interested only in taking the money they saved from property tax revenue — about $20 million. The money is expected to fund the GWSD portion of major infrastructure upgrades at the sanitation plant it shares with GSD. They repeatedly expressed doubts that the city could handle the new responsibility.

However, given unfinished matters that the city had hoped would have been settled by now, city staff recommended a withdrawal of the detachment efforts at least until they were settled.

One is the city’s revenue neutrality agreement with the county. As a condition of incorporation, the city’s founding parents entered into a tax-sharing agreement to have a certain percentage of certain taxes collected by the city forwarded to the county. The city is in talks with the county to renegotiate those taxes, but success has been elusive.

“We were hoping we would have finished with that by now,” City Manager Dan Singer said.

In addition, the recent passage of Proposition 26, which affects certain state and local fees, could impact the detachment, Singer said, adding that the county Board of Supervisors hasn’t had a chance to discuss the effects of detachment on county territory, such as Isla Vista.

“We believe it is in the best interest of our community to have concrete answers to these questions,” Mayor Eric Onnen said in a statement issued by the city. “When we initiated the process, we believed our revenue neutrality discussions would be completed by the time our application was ready for hearing (by the Local Agency Formation Commission, or LAFCO). Although the process has taken longer than expected, we are committed to seeing it through.”

It’s not over yet for the city or the district, as the city has expressed that it may take up its detachment again in the future.

The Goleta West Sanitary District can breathe a sigh of relief — however brief it may be.

For the moment, the rescinding of the resolution to pursue detachment is a good sign to Director Larry Meyer that the cost to ratepayers in the district will be kept low. It also will keep the Goleta Valley area from having more sanitary districts than it needs, he said. Plus, the money earmarked for the sanitation facility upgrade would not disappear into the city’s coffers.

But the district will be vigilant, Meyer said.

“We’re going to be keeping our eyes on the situation,” he said.

Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.