Thursday, May 24 , 2018, 1:17 am | Overcast 59º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Consensus Elusive on Updates to Santa Barbara’s General Plan

Housing density, spurring varying community opinions, remains the biggest sticking point

After an hours-long discussion that has become characteristic of any General Plan update meeting, the Santa Barbara City Council decided Tuesday to push the matter to next week.

The elusive finish line is mostly related to housing density, or units per acre, which is the crux of disagreement in making goals for 2030. The seven-member council’s difficulty at finding consensus is representative of the varying community opinions, and a lot of specific decisions have to be made.

A subcommittee made up of Councilmen Dale Francisco, Frank Hotchkiss and Das Williams met to nail down some consensus in the past few weeks and will meet again Friday to — hopefully — make final recommendations that enough votes can get behind to adopt the plan.

“We have to be really careful not to nitpick this to death,” said Councilman Grant House, who perceives broad support for the current version.

If the council can find consensus on a general direction, he said, details can be worked on during the implementation phase.

On Monday, a community coalition sent recommendations to city staff, who have been redrawing and rewriting portions of the land use and housing elements as opinions change.

Affordable housing is a priority for the group, which encouraged rental housing in the medium-high density areas in the downtown core and suggested a buffer on either side of the freeway where density can’t increase, given the environmental concerns. For the most part, the suggestions lined up with the Planning Commission’s “hybrid” growth model.

Also involved were the American Planning Association, the Citizens Planning Association, COAST, the Coastal Housing Coalition, SBCAN, SB4All, the League of Women Voters, PUEBLO and the Community Environmental Council.

“You go along with something that may not be 100 percent what you want, but brings you toward the common goal (of more affordable housing),” said Mickey Flacks of SB4All.

Some felt differently, and Cathie McCammon said the Allied Neighborhoods Association couldn’t support the coalition though the group is “not opposed to looking at proposed changes.”

Architect Gil Barry and Planning Commissioner Sheila Lodge said they opposed the high-growth areas proposed — on the Haley corridor, for one — and that high density growth never did a small town any good. Lodge said that Goleta and Carpinteria have lower density, lower housing prices and lower crime.

Staff said there has been an average of 90 units built per year, though Francisco noted that many of those came from Redevelopment Agency funds. The 2015 sunset of the city’s RDA means an upcoming drop in government-subsidized housing, so the units per year probably will drop, he said.

On Tuesday, Nov. 23, the subcommittee is likely to consider some of the community coalition’s suggestions and bring recommendations to the City Council.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >