Tuesday, October 23 , 2018, 11:31 pm | Fair 63º

 
 
 
 

Commentary: The Smartest Guys in the Room

There are only good ideas, bad ideas, and luck. And really, it's mostly luck.

Why would we listen to the same people who got us into this mess to get us out of it?

Our natural tendency is to listen to successful people on any financial subject. They must know something that we don’t or they wouldn’t be rich. And, we feel, Rich = Smart.

Should we listen to them?

I’ve given this question a lot of thought in the past year. I’ve always been a bit of an ideologue — well not just a “bit.” I believe ideas mean something in that you’ve got to have some basis or theory through which the world makes sense to you.

To determine what’s right or wrong most of us fall back on our own judgment in areas we understand. Or think we understand. When we don’t really understand something, we listen to those whom we think do understand. In the financial world we listen to Buffett, and Paulson and Kramer, and the like, and generally, any one we know who’s made a ton of money.

But, if they are so smart how come they have been so wrong? And, I mean, really wrong. So wrong that we are in the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression.

I don’t mean to demean the above-named gentlemen because they have been very, very successful and deserve accolades for that. But, even Berkshire Hathaway is down 31 percent.

I think we should pause and think about how we got in this mess. More specifically: how we let ourselves be convinced that our financial leaders, public and private, were right when we now clearly see that they were very wrong.

Maybe They Were Just Lucky

I’ve been working on a list of all the hedge funds and investment banks that have gone broke, are about to go broke, have lost a ton of money for their clients, or the investment stars who have been fired for some of the foregoing acts. It’s a very long list. (See The Problems, below.) And I just started looking. What you see are some of the headlines I’ve pulled out of Dow Jones Financial News Online’s daily e-mail from just the last six weeks or so.

Let us take for granted that these are all very bright men, they have vast knowledge of the financial markets, have operated honestly and in good faith, and at some point made a lot of money for their investors and clients.

Now we find that they’ve jumped off the bridge attached to a rope that’s tied around our necks.

Why do we listen to them? Are they right about economics when they are successful and wrong when they are not?

Could it be that they were just lucky — in an up market?

I’ve decided that there are only good ideas, bad ideas, and luck. And really, it’s mostly luck.

Nasim Taleb in his books Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness has addressed this issue brilliantly. He tackles the question of “how do we know what we know” through social science discoveries that relate to this question. It is a branch of science and philosophy called epistemology. He shows that there are behavioral and statistical reasons why we all make the same mistakes. That is, the nature of the human mind and personality make us prone to make the same mistakes over and over.

His basic premise is that financial experts underestimate risk. As such they are caught by surprise when some significant unforeseen event occurs. Such events can be good or bad, but it is the bad ones that can kill you. The surprise is that these kinds of events, he refers to them as Black Swans, occur unpredictably but regularly.

The bad Black Swans have been killing the experts for years. Yet they refuse to recognize their errors. I urge you to read Taleb’s books. They are profound, challenging and eye-opening.

His conclusion is that the success of most traders in hedge funds and investment banks are mostly the result of luck. Their investment philosophy just happened to coincide with the market at a given time.

Taleb points out that if you take the investment results of the universe of investment advisers and plot them on a graph, they look like a random sampling of data. Which means, based on statistics, that the investment results achieved would have occurred randomly in the investment world: a very few investors will be very successful, some will bust, and most fit in somewhere around the middle (returns somewhere around the S&P 500).

There are a few investors who have been successful over the years, but not many. But, he claims, it’s very difficult to tell under the tools of statistical analysis if it’s luck or skill. I personally would like to think it’s skill.

Why Listen to Guys Who Were Just Lucky?

If Taleb is correct, we should be suspicious of lucky people who offer financial advice. And, be especially suspicious of their economic advice.

I like to follow the quarterly list of economists’ predictions in The Wall Street Journal. At the end of each quarter they compare their predictions. You seldom see any economist get it right more than once. They are guessing. An educated guess to be sure, but still they are guessing and they all tend to guess in the same way.

Then there are the hedge and investment fund managers. Most managers stick to one of several known strategies, generally the ones they see other people doing. Rarely do they stick their necks out and do something different. There’s comfort in being wrong if everyone is wrong. But occasionally they get it right and pull out enough money to last forever and I congratulate them for that. But does that meant they are qualified to give economic or financial advice if they’re just lucky?

It’s my opinion that most of these people are blinded by their own success. Especially those who have pulled large amounts of personal wealth out of the system. There is a tendency of these people to universalize their own experience. That is, they believe the lessons they learned should be applied to the world as a whole and we would all be much better off. Or, if they happen to have an economic philosophy, they will attribute that to their success, and therefore, their brand of economic philosophy should be applied universally.

Maybe they confuse their good luck with success. Maybe their philosophy had nothing to do with their success.

These people are now pushing a lot of advice on our government leaders, but ... Why should we listen to them? Many of these experts are the ones who led us off the deep end.

Who Got It Right and Why?

Why don’t we listen to those who got it right? And I’m not talking about those who called the market right and made a killing (John Paulson, George Soros or James Simons). Why should we believe they weren’t just lucky or that they know anything about economics? Soros is one of the best at making money since he’s hit it big twice now, but his economic and political philosophy are dead wrong.

Who in the world warned us about the bubble and predicted serious consequences?

In my opinion, it was and is the free-market economists. These are either Monetarists (Milton Friedman) or Austrians (Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek).

The Austrian School of economics (its founders and followers were mostly Austrian) are the guys who discovered the cause of business cycles and how to treat them. They analyzed recessions and depressions and determined how and why they were caused.

Ah, “obscure economists,” you might say. Well, Hayek did receive a Nobel in economics, but, yes, the tide of Keynesianism swept many opponents into the minority after World War II.

But, the free-market guys have been right. Correct in predicting bubbles, correct in predicting the busts, correct in predicting the effects of socialism or Keynesian policy, and correct in extolling the benefits of capitalism. Click here for more information from the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Why Don’t We Listen to Them?

I am amazed at the many commentators and economists who believe in the blessings of government interventionism when the results are often the opposite of what they intended. These prominent people who are now in power are advocating many of the same things today that were tried and failed during the Depression. In fact, these programs they advocate actually helped cause the Depression. These thinkers are unaware of the negative consequences of their policies.

Forget economic theory for a moment and just look at the facts. Boom and bust is caused by central banks, or going back in history, the sovereign. In some way, throughout history, the people in charge of the monetary system, by flooding the economy with cheap money, create a boom. Rarely does it end well. This cycle was no different.

I recommend Amity Shlaes’ new book, The Forgotten Man, a new history of the Great Depression, or Murray Rothbard’s The Great Depression, perhaps one of the best economic histories ever written. If you don’t agree that the circumstances are very similar to today, then only time will tell if you’re right. Do you want to take that chance?

Here Are Some Things We All Should Be Thinking About

We are at a crossroad right now, not unlike the one that Presidents Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt faced during the early 1930s. I believe the actions taken by our leaders now have momentous consequences for us all. If they get it wrong, we could face another Great Depression, or at least years of stagnation and inflation.

I can tell you, our leaders aren’t listening to the free-market economists, leastwise the Austrians.

Here are some questions you should ask yourself:

1. Do Ben Bernanke and the Fed know what they’re doing?

Bernanke’s a very smart guy (1590 on the SAT; Harvard; Ph.D. at MIT). He was a student of the Great Depression. He lauded Friedman on the latter’s 90th birthday by saying, don’t worry, “we won’t do it (Great Depression) again.” Like Friedman, he doesn’t seem to get the true relationship between inflation to interest rates: it’s more than just pumping the economy with money.

He’s an econometrician, like Alan Greenspan. He thinks he can tinker with the money supply and make all the bad things go away. Greenspan inflated our way out of the Long-Term Capital Management collapse, the Asian currency collapse, and the Dot.com collapse. Which led us to the current problem. It’s funny that we had so many bubble cycles with Greenspan. Why do we think Bernanke will be right this time?

2. Do Henry Paulson and the people at Treasury know what they are doing?

On Nov. 12, they all but admitted they didn’t know what they were doing and dropped their plan to buy bad bank assets and instead invest capital into banks. This didn’t give anyone any confidence and the stock market plummeted.

It is simply beyond the Treasury’s or the Fed’s ability to “solve” the problem. The problems are in the trillions of dollars and I believe Paulson and his people are just beginning to figure this out. Now securitized auto and credit card loans are in trouble. Commercial property values are dropping. Credit default swaps, potentially a $46 trillion problem, loom out there.

True the recession will be nasty, but the sooner they let the market reallocate resources from the incompetent to the competent, the quicker we’ll recover. This is the opposite of what they are doing. Are they paving the way for something worse?

3. Do President-elect Barack Obama and his economic advisers know what they are doing?

I hope so. His advisers are New York Fed president Timothy Geithner (not an economist), former Clinton advisers Larry Summers, Robert Rubin and Robert Reich (not an economist), former Fed chairman Paul Volcker, and University of Chicago Booth School of Business professor Austan Goolsbee.

They are all remaining quiet until Obama is sworn in. Most of them are all Harvard- or MIT-trained economists. I would guess these advisers will offer no different solutions than what we are seeing now, with the exception that we would see more fiscal stimulus. Ask yourself: would taking money (taxation) out of your pocket (i.e., the economy) and letting the government decide where it should be spent make sense in an economy starved for credit? Would bridge repair employ the hundreds of thousands of unemployed mortgage and real estate brokers, bankers, and financial workers?

4. Do the financial leaders who got us into this mess know what they are doing?

The ones who caused the problem seem to be the ones asking for government cash to bail them out. I would say their self-interest cancels out their objectivity.

— Jeff Harding is a principal of Montecito Realty Investors LLC. A student of economics, he has a strong affinity for free-market economics. This commentary originally appeared on his blog, Subprime Crisis Forum.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.