Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, March 26 , 2019, 2:33 pm | Partly Cloudy 63º


Brendan Huffman: High Times and Misdemeanors in L.A.

Santa Barbara's not the only city with marijuana smoke swirling about

On the same day that a new police chief assumed the helm in Los Angeles, a battle waged at City Hall over marijuana dispensaries.

Here in L.A., we have experienced an explosion of such dispensaries over the past four years. While other cities in California acted to limit the numbers of dispensaries, our city council opted to keep punting the issue to avoid having to favor important constituencies over others.

Today, it is estimated that there are approximately 1,000 pot dispensaries in the city of Los Angeles, many of which are concentrated in the San Fernando Valley where I live. One is located just one block from my house, and another is located two blocks from my kids’ elementary school.

For those with chronic pains or facing deadly diseases, I don’t think very many people object to them being able to get relief. The objections usually arise from residential and commercial neighbors who complain about the dispensaries’ clientele, who, in some cases smoke pot inside the store or in the parking lot or loiter in front of the store. Others worry that some stores are a magnet for crime.

According to law enforcement, the pot dispensaries make it easier for drug dealers to buy large quantities of pot locally with little hassle and re-sell it on the street to regular stoners who are too lazy to obtain “recommendations” from doctors. Some dispensaries, they argue, work with drug cartels and gangs to grow and distribute their products, which, unlike drugs sold at pharmacies, are not regulated so that consumers don’t always know just what exactly they’re inhaling.

L.A.’s newly elected city attorney, Carmen Trutanich, and Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley have both forcefully argued that the sale of marijuana in California is strictly against the law. Proposition 215, which I voted for in 1996, does not allow for the sale of pot — only the cultivation of six plants per year for medicinal purposes. If cultivation is not practical, another option is to help finance cultivation through a nonprofit co-op.

So far, the L.A. City Council has ignored Trutanich (who in four short months in office has managed to antagonize nearly the entire city council and downtown establishment). And now Cooley, a close ally of Trutanich, has announced he will step up enforcement of his interpretation of the law and shut down every for-profit dispensary in Los Angeles County.

Cooley’s announcement occurred just hours after Police Chief Charlie Beck was approved by the city council and sworn in by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The dispensary dispute puts Beck in a pickle. Does he risk going against the city council on the first crisis on his watch? Or does he go along with the council’s defiance of state and federal laws and allow the dispensaries to stay put? This complicated issue needs leadership.

For many homeowners and pot dispensary operators alike, questions arise about why the city council, which is a full-time job paying $178,000 annually, did nothing while other cities with far fewer resources and part-time officeholders were able to limit dispensaries to just a handful? What happened?

As with other high-profile legislative bodies, L.A. council members have learned it’s more politically expedient to ignore problems than to address them — and we as voters have allowed this to occur. If a complicated problem cannot be fixed quickly and without angering some vocal people, it’s not worth getting involved. Another factor is that half the city council — along with our mayor — will be termed out in 2013, and each of them is either running for mayor or statewide office.

Like onlookers who passively walk by crimes in process, it’s easier not to get involved.

Brendan Huffman is a San Fernando Valley-based consultant specializing in issue advocacy and association management, and host of Off the Presses on L.A. Talk Radio. This commentary originally appeared on FoxandHoundsDaily.com.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.