Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 4:45 pm | Overcast 64º

 
 
 
 

Mona Charen: Rioting Penn State Students Add Insult to Injury

Mob's destruction over Paterno firing only brings more shame amid child abuse scandal

The initial shock of the child abuse scandal at Penn State was disturbing enough, but what came later may have been even more so.

That Joe Paterno, other coaches and members of the administration failed in a straightforward, utterly uncomplicated moral task — to protect defenseless children from rape — is almost mind numbing. No weighing of competing interests or complex variables was required. On one hand, you had children being abused, and on the other, the reputation of a hugely profitable football program. They chose the football program!

In a condign coda, they’ve done far more damage to the program’s reputation by choosing the immoral path than they would have by doing the right thing. If the alleged predator, Jerry Sandusky, had been arrested for child abuse in 2002 (or at any point in the previous decade as reports filtered up of his criminal conduct), it would have been a one-day story. Instead, the beloved Paterno has been fired. The president of the university is out, and Penn State stands revealed (and reviled) as a corrupt institution.

When people violate our standards of decency, our desire for justice demands a certain social sanction. A crime or sin is a tear in the social fabric, and our collective disapproval and censure is the way we begin to repair it. When that process breaks down, it makes us feel insecure and makes the transgression all the more threatening.

So it was almost as dismaying to see the response of a mob of Penn State students reacting to the ouster of Paterno as it was to hear about the child abuse itself. When word of the firings first reached campus, thousands of students surged from their dorms and rampaged down the streets of State College, Pa., blowing air horns and other noisemakers in the middle of the night.

They chanted Paterno’s name, threw rocks and fireworks at police, knocked down two light poles, and overturned and crushed a local TV news truck. According to The New York Times, the mob also tore down street signs, smashed car windows, and tipped over trash cans and newspaper vending boxes. Call it Occupy State College. The only missing piece was public defecation.

What they intended to convey by this mayhem is less clear. A freshman told the Times that students blamed the media for Paterno’s fall. Ah, so that’s it. Well, then, the only obvious answer is to smash car windows and destroy a news truck.

A handful of the braying barbarians was arrested. But the rest returned to their dorms — presumably to finish their homework for courses in “racial categories” and “postmodern lesbianism.” They probably won’t reflect on the irony of a university — the kind of place where a stray word can get you cashiered for sexual harassment — being responsible for the grossest criminal negligence regarding children.

The students were angry and upset, and they’ve been taught to believe that their feelings, whatever they are, deserve to be expressed. Well, they don’t — at least not in that way. As even the tolerant New York Times noted in its coverage, “Some students noted the irony of their coming out to oppose what they saw as a disgraceful end to Mr. Paterno’s distinguished career and then adding to the ignobility of the episode by starting an unruly protest.”

Here’s a suggestion: What the students ought to have felt, and perhaps did feel, though they hardly have names for this antique sensation anymore, was shame. Though personally innocent, until the riot, they should have felt ashamed to be associated with an institution that allegedly enabled a serial child rapist to prey upon victims.

Their proper mood ought to have been one of sadness and a desire to make restitution. Anger, too, should have played a part. Not anger at the board of trustees for firing responsible officials, rather anger at the university’s administration for permitting a profound outrage. That’s the way a community with basic moral understanding behaves.

A couple of days after the riot, a larger crowd of students did hold a candlelight vigil for the victims, which was encouraging. The mood at the vigil was described as “solemn” with subdued applause for several speakers. But the students seemed unable to sustain a serious mien for very long, and by the end, the vigil was transformed into a rally with the crowd bellowing, “We are Penn State!”

One student participant said of Paterno’s firing that “having that taken away from us made us feel lost.” No, they were lost long before that.

Mona Charen of National Review magazine writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her. Follow Mona Charen on Twitter: @mcharen.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >