Monday, October 22 , 2018, 9:36 pm | Fair 61º

 
 
 
 

Carpinteria Man Accused of Planting Hidden Camera to Enter Plea in January

Judge rules suspect Donald Lee Bedford must answer to a felony charge, as well as a misdemeanor, in the case

A judge ruled Friday that a felony charge, as well as a misdemeanor, were appropriate in the case of a Carpinteria man accused of eavesdropping on his girlfriend’s daughter via a hidden camera in her bedroom.

Donald Lee Bedford
Donald Lee Bedford

Donald Lee Bedford, 55, was arrested in July after the 30-year-old woman discovered a camera hidden inside a book on a bookshelf in her room. He has been charged with one count of felony eavesdropping and a count of unlawful electronic peeping, which is a misdemeanor.

Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Cliff Anderson ruled Friday that Bedford will have to answer to the felony charge, and denied his defense’s motion to reduce it to a misdemeanor. Bedford is expected to enter a plea at his Jan. 7 arraignment.

Bedford appeared in court and out of custody Thursday and Friday, and the prosecution and defense wrapped up their arguments in the preliminary hearing. The camera footage was the centerpiece of the court discussion.

Although the courtroom wasn’t allowed to see portions of the tape, it apparently reveals the victim and her boyfriend disrobing and watching television together in her bedroom. The beginning of the tape shows Bedford tinkering with the camera, flashing up to his face.

The courtroom wasn’t allowed to watch the next part of the tape either, but the audio was kept on for the public to hear. The noise of the room’s television is prominent, although several conversations between the couple can be heard.

After the camera was discovered by the woman, Bedford went to the victim’s mother and told her what he had done, according to a sheriff’s detective. He told her he had planted the camera to listen to her daughter’s financial situation, but the mother thought Bedford had planted the camera for a sexual purpose.

The presence of audio makes a crime a felony if confidential communications are captured, and defense attorney William Makler argued Friday that Bedford had no actual intent of listening to anything from the room. He called the camera “an incompetent listening device.” Because of the noise of the television and the placement of the recorder inside the book, Makler said it was “a stretch” that Bedford could have used the device to listen to confidential communications.

“I don’t think this amounts to eavesdropping” because of intent, Makler told Anderson. He called Bedford’s actions “shocking and outrageous,” but that his actions constituted minimal eavesdropping at best.

Prosecutor Ali Neuffer disagreed. She argued that Bedford was in a special position of trust to the victim, had a key to the home and had been dating her mother for years. She also brought up Bedford’s criminal background. According to Neuffer, Bedford was arrested last year for domestic violence against the victim’s mother, and was caught prowling in 2006. Another domestic violence charge also exists from 2004 involving Bedford and the woman.

Neuffer said Makler’s statements about the audio “fly in the face of invasion of privacy law.” Even though most of the audio exchanged between the victim and her boyfriend is inaudible, “it doesn’t make her less of a victim,” Neuffer said.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews. Become a fan of Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.