Pixel Tracker

Monday, February 18 , 2019, 4:33 am | Fair 46º


Edison Customers Express Concern, Frustration Over Installation of Smart Meters

Administrative law judge and CPUC representative listen to 2½ hours of feedback at a public hearing in Santa Barbara

Residents of Santa Barbara and Ventura counties attending a public hearing Friday afternoon expressed their outrage over smart meter installations and Southern California Edison’s fees for the opt-out program.

Administrative law judge Amy Yip Kikugawa and a representative from the California Public Utilities Commission listened to 2½ hours of concerns and complaints from Edison customers, most of whom have opted out of having a new, wireless SmartConnect meter installed.

By keeping an analog meter, SCE customers are required to pay an initial $75 fee followed by $10 monthly, which people called “highway robbery” and “extortion,” among other things.

There was no action taken at the hearing, but Kikugawa said the transcripts will be sent to all five CPUC commissioners, since none was present for Friday’s hearing. It was just Kikugawa and Carol Brown, a representative for CPUC president Michael Peevey, in the Hearing Room of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building in Santa Barbara.

Customer concerns are based on the charge for the opt-out program, health and privacy concerns. Beyond that, people are furious that the changeover to smart meters was even approved — and that the CPUC has been unresponsive to their concerns.

Ojai resident Sue Williamson asked why the CPUC wasn’t present at the hearing, since commissioners have the power to change this program and address the concerns.

“Karma is going to bite you in the butt,” she said.

Santa Barbara County 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal asked the CPUC to create an affordable opt-out option for customers, while everyone else requested that the charges be eliminated entirely.

“It’s very clear that the overwhelming majority in this room believe they should not have to pay anybody for something they don’t want,” said attorney and former Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara.

Senate Bill 17, which created the program allowing smart meters, requires cyber security and implementation that doesn’t compromise consumer or worker safety, and Edison’s program doesn’t accomplish those things, Nava said.

Attorney and former Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara, was among dozens of speakers at Friday's public hearing to discuss smart meters installed by Southern California Edison. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)
Attorney and former Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara, was among dozens of speakers at Friday’s public hearing to discuss smart meters installed by Southern California Edison. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

The fees are a “ridiculous, absurd amount of money,” Oxnard resident George Miller said.

Diane Hawkins of the Ventura County Libertarian Party said Edison’s electricity monopoly means customers can’t avoid the opt-out options. Having the opt-out is a “false choice,” she she.

“It’s like asking whether you want your right ear cut off or your left ear cut off,” Hawkins said.

More people would opt out of having new meters installed but simply can’t afford to, many said Friday.

Health concerns dominate the reasons these customers are against the new meters, and many say they’ve experienced headaches, heart palpitations or electrical interference from the ones installed at their homes or neighbors’ homes.

Others are worried about the potential impacts of the technology’s electromagnetic output.

“I am not willing to use my family as a science experiment,” one woman said.

Some people said they are extra-sensitive to wireless technology and electromagnetic fields, and have been worse since the smart meters came around. Even if they opt-out, some said, their neighbors may not, so the technology is still very close to their homes.

Residents of condominium and apartment complexes have the same issue, but multiplied. Most meters for these complexes are installed in banks next to each other, so one unit has multiple meters on the wall.

Homeowners expressed privacy concerns as well, since the meters make it clear when someone is home — or at least when and how much power is being used.

Gary Vanderman of Goleta worried about the remote turn on/shut off power with the new meters, too. Whether purposefully, accidentally or through some kind of software glitch, “anytime, anywhere, your power can be shut off,” he said.

He said he has opted out as a protection against that.

Some told stories about installers coming onto private property without permission, even when the person has already opted out.

Corex, which installs meters for SCE, was called a lot of bad names Friday, and residents complained that some meters were installed even at properties registered for the opt-out program.

Once installed, it’s been impossible to get the meters removed, some said.

One man, who lives in an apartment, said he wouldn’t think twice if someone installed one on his property without permission.

“I would smash every single f****ing one of them,” he said.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.