Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, January 23 , 2019, 4:08 am | Fair 39º


Jury Deliberations Begin in Corey Lyons Double-Homicide Trial

Prosecutor rebuts the defense's theory of multiple shooters and the explanation for gunshot residue found on Lyons

Jurors in the Corey Lyons double-homicide case started deliberations Tuesday after Senior Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen made his rebuttal argument.

The prosecution accuses Lyons, of Goleta, of fatally shooting his brother, Daniel Lyons, and his brother’s partner, Barbara Scharton, in their Aurora Avenue home in the early morning hours of May 4, 2009.

A contentious lawsuit between the brothers regarding the home’s construction, done by Corey Lyons, has been argued to be the motive behind the killings.

While defense attorney Bob Sanger argues that Lyons was in his motor home across the street from his Goleta home all night except to leave and call his sister, Zonen argues that Lyons shot the couple, hid the weapons and sneaked back into the motor home. When Santa Barbara police officers came to question Lyons around 3 a.m., about 90 minutes after the shootings, he wasn’t in the house or motor home, which both his wife, Mildred Lyons, and police offices had looked in, Zonen said.

In his rebuttal argument, Zonen rejected Sanger’s argument that there were multiple shooters. Instead, Zonen argued that the single shooter was in the house for four minutes or less and that police officers did a thorough investigation of the crime scene.

The attorneys also gave different explanations for the gunshot residue found on Lyons’ hands, truck, gloves and fanny pack. Zonen said firing 14 shots in the bedrooms would cover the assailant in residue, while Sanger argued that the residue on the hands could be from contamination during police custody and the rest from previous use of Lyons’ gun collection.

Studies of contamination in the police station never found more than a handful of particles total, and Lyons had 20 particles on his hands that were characteristic of gunshot residue, Zonen said in his rebuttal.

The guns used in the murders were never found.

The 12 jurors went into deliberations Tuesday morning and must come to a unanimous decision to reach either a guilty or not guilty verdict for the charges.

Lyons is facing two first-degree murder charges with special allegations of use of a firearm, multiple murders, lying in wait and murder for financial gain. If the jury doesn’t unanimously agree to those charges, it will be asked to consider two second-degree murder charges as well as residential burglary and entering a residence with the intent to commit a felony.

The case has spent ample time in Santa Barbara County Superior Court, with the first attempt ending in a mistrial and the second resulting in a hung jury, with a 7-5 decision. Jurors for the current trial are being bused in each day from northern Santa Barbara County.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >