Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, January 23 , 2019, 1:26 pm | Fair 61º


Appeals Court Sides with City of Goleta, Owner on Subdividing Mobile-Home Park

The California Court of Appeals has sided with Rancho Mobile Home Park owner Daniel Guggenheim and the City of Goleta, allowing the park to be subdivided with lots sold to residents.

According to the unpublished opinion posted March 7, the court reversed the previous Santa Barbara County Superior Court ruling in favor of the Monarch Country Mobilehome Owners Association.

Scroll down to view the court ruling document.

Guggenheim conducted a survey of resident support for the conversion of rental units to rental ownership, instead of the current system of residents owning their homes but renting the space beneath them.

Guggenheim sued the city twice over its involvement in the park and won both times. In 2009, the city negotiated an agreement with Guggenheim that required him “to make significant efforts to help residents purchase the land under their home and to protect the others against future rent increases,” according to a city statement.

Residents sued the City of Goleta for making an agreement with Guggenheim over this conversion, which would split the park into separate legal lots. They opposed the agreement and argued that splitting the park into separate lots would exempt the rest of the park from being subject to the city’s rent control ordinance.

Superior Court Judge Denise de Bellefeuille sided with the park’s tenants, ruling that the survey wasn’t conducted correctly and that the Goleta City Council failed to consider the results of the survey. Though there are 150 spaces, only 33 ballots for the survey were received, with 17 opposed to the conversion, according to the Court of Appeals opinion written by Judge Kenneth Yegan.

The Court of Appeals reversed the decision, concluding that there was substantial evidence that the City Council considered the results of the survey and the public hearing in 2009. 

“While we are satisfied that the court recognized that the city’s decision is correct, the state Legislature needs to fix this statute and make it clear that cities have authority to protect their residents,” Goleta Mayor Roger Aceves said in a statement.

Goleta spent more than $500,000 on litigation expenses related to this mobile-home park, according to City Attorney Tim Giles.

“The conversion statute has been criticized for limiting the ability of local jurisdictions to consider local conditions in deciding whether a conversion is appropriate,” the city said in a statement. “The city has repeatedly supported unsuccessful legislative efforts which would make the law clearer and expressly provide local authorities appropriate discretion.

“State law severely limits what actions a city can take when reviewing an application to convert a mobile-home park to resident ownership. In this case, the court decided that the decision made by the Goleta City Council was the only decision they could make.”

In a related case, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Goleta’s rent control ordinance to protect mobile home residents from “unwarranted increases of space rent.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  Court of Appeal Ruling by  

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >