Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, December 18 , 2018, 10:11 am | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Supervisors Delay Action on Appeal of Zipline Proposed for Santa Ynez Valley

Another last-minute email, this time from Caltrans regarding a traffic issue, prompts the board to further postpone the topic until July 19

Stuart Gildred, left, who is proposing to build a zipline and ropes course near Buellton, and engineer Mark Lloyd speak to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday about the project. On the screen is Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf.
Stuart Gildred, left, who is proposing to build a zipline and ropes course near Buellton, and engineer Mark Lloyd speak to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday about the project. On the screen is Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)

An 11th-hour traffic issue led the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday to delay action on an appeal of a zipline and ropes course proposed for the Santa Ynez Valley.

The topic will return to the board during a July 19 meeting in Santa Barbara, supervisors said after staff sought more time to assess a Caltrans email sent to a project opponent regarding proposed improvements for the driveway at Highway 246. 

Stuart Gildred seeks to build and operate the Sierra Grande Rural Recreational Project, which would have a zipline and ropes course facility on 40 acres of three contiguous ranch parcels adding up to 1,186 acres. The facility would operate seven days a week during daylight hours. At its peak in the summer, the facility would host up to 80 visitors per day.

As he left the hearing Tuesday, Gildred muttered “unbelievable” at the newest delay he blamed on disgruntled neighbors with traffic concerns.

He said he plans to rally the community to fill the audience for the July 19 meeting.

“Show up and support youth recreation for our kids because it’s a good project that shouldn’t be thrown out or not approved because the process is flawed,” Gildred said. “So please, please come support us. It’s very frustrating.”

Neighbor Rick Oas, who appealed the Santa Barbara County Planning Commission's approval of a conditional use permit for the project, said he favors looking at all the aspects of the project to make the most educated decision.

A shared driveway extending south from Highway 246 less than a mile to the project site is the focus of many aspects cited in the appeal filed by Oas, of Pollyrich Farms. The appeal contends access is inappropriate and would turn the private driveway into a public thoroughfare.  

The roadway would require traveling across the Santa Ynez River bed via an “Arizona crossing.”

The appellant also contends noise and biological resources are issues plus seeks a full-blown environmental impact report on the project.

County staff included a requirement that the zipline line developer must add a flare to the driveway to help drivers entering the site to safely slow down to turn off Highway 246.

But the newest email from Melissa Streder of Caltrans to Oas supporter and traffic engineer Larry Hail contends the project must include a lane for arriving vehicles to slow down and a lane for departing vehicles to accelerate. 

County staff had obtained an opinion — requiring only the deceleration lane — from a different Caltrans employee who has since left the agency.

Attempts to clarify the newest opinion could not be resolved during the lunch break Tuesday, prompting staff to recommend that the board continue the hearing. 

This is the only the latest delay for the project in the works since 2012. 

“It’s so unfair,” Gildred said, claiming the project has broad support from the community yet has been stalled by a small number of opponents.

“I’m so blown away it happened again,” he said, adding that an earlier delay was blamed on a last-minute issue raised by the California Department of Fish & Wildlife.

As the board prepared to continue the item, Third District Supervisor Doreen Farr said she knew it was disappointing.

“But certainly Caltrans is too important to ignore,” Farr said. “It’s very important that we get this right and staff have the time to work with them and make sure our paperwork is all in order before we come back.”

Fifth District Supervisor Steve Lavagnino also noted that this is the second delay due to a last-minute email.

“It would be really nice to be able to either give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down next time,” Lavagnino added. 

Noozhawk North County editor Janene Scully can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

A map shows the layout of the zipline and ropes course facility proposed near Buellton. Click to view larger
A map shows the layout of the zipline and ropes course facility proposed near Buellton. (Contributed photo)

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.