Tuesday, July 17 , 2018, 5:53 pm | Fair 72º

 
 
 
 

Cinema in Focus: ‘Closed Circuit’

The film explores the question of how far government could or should go to protect its citizens during terrorist attacks

3 Stars — Thought-provoking

Martin Luther King Jr. once stated: "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Never is this more true than in Irishman John Crowley's creation of Closed Circuit, a look at the moral morass that lies beneath a terrorist bombing in a British train station that has less than clear cut motives and involvement by the British government.

When a post-9/11 bombing kills dozens of people in a crowded train station in downtown London, the British government takes a series of highly watched legal maneuvers to ensure the public that this case will be solved with no expense spared, no rock unturned to seek justice.

Eric Bana plays Martin Rose, the lead in the defense, and Rebecca Hall plays Claudia Simmons-Howe, who has been specially appointed to manage and protect evidence that could affect national security. Everyone is to be watched by the government to ensure that there are no holes in the case and that there is no inappropriate contact between parties that could lead to a mistrial. The government wants a conviction of the lone terrorist who was caught after the bombing.

While the title of the film suggests that there is a lot of spying of the public going on through cameras in every public location, the real focus of the story is on what the cameras cannot see — namely, the motives and relationships of the key players. Martin Rose, who is defending the terrorist, and Claudia Simmons-Howe, who is the national security advisor, are to have little contact outside of the courtroom and they have pledged to the government that they will abide by this rule. What they did not tell the government was that they were former lovers and she was the rationale for Martin's marriage dissolving.

To add intrigue to the story, the lead prosecutor commits suicide. Or did he? Maybe he uncovered a "dirty little secret" in the British government and their covert relationship with the terrorist bomber. This theory takes on more credibility when both Martin and Claudia begin to uncover the same information, and then find themselves being chased by paid assassins.

We won't give away what everyone uncovers or how the trial proceeds, but the question that we are confronted with is: What is moral and just? Do all ends justify the means? Is there no accountability for what the secret services of our country do? In the name of national security, have we traded off all of our freedoms and rights, including the right not to be watched by closed circuit cameras everywhere?

Some of the most disturbing conversations that occurred after the World Trade Center bombing on Sept. 11, 2001, sounded the notion that for the sake of national security, we might just have to forgo the rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. The government needs to know everything about what you are doing in order to provide peace and security for all the citizens of the United States. Some people who have stood up out of moral concern are branded as traitors to our nation. In Closed Circuit, some good people may have to be sacrificed for the good of the whole nation.

In our post-modern culture where people pass self-righteous judgment on others daily in a feeding frenzy of rootless morality, our governments have raised the art of bending the truth to protect the social and political order to a new level when it comes to protecting our national interests.

Closed Circuit is a heart-thumping drama with a lot of twists and turns. More importantly, though, it may be a "wakeup call" for all of us to watch carefully what our governments do in the name of freedom and democracy.

Discussion:

» What freedom are you willing to give up to be safe? In what way will that change you?

» The experience of being watched by a government is increasingly true. How much surveillance do you believe our government has on each of us — cell phones, bank records, traffic habits? On what basis do you believe this?

» The desire to infiltrate terrorist groups could cause more danger. Do you believe we should engage in such covert operations?

— Cinema in Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary. Hal Conklin is a former mayor of Santa Barbara and Denny Wayman is pastor of Free Methodist Church, 1435 Cliff Drive. For more reviews, visit www.cinemainfocus.com, or follow them on Twitter: @CinemaInFocus. The opinions expressed are their own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >