Sunday, October 21 , 2018, 5:48 am | Fair 59º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Cinema in Focus: ‘Steve Jobs’

3 Stars — Engaging

Steve Jobs saw himself an artist more than a businessman. Rather than seeing the computer as a product that needed to fit the desires of possible customers, Jobs believed he was creating a work of art that would enhance and transform people into the customers they should have been. 

It was this perspective that was both his genius and his nemesis. It is also this polarity that is captured by director Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire) and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin (Moneyball) in the film simply titled Steve Jobs.

Known for his portrayal as Magneto in the X-Men franchise, Michael Fassbender brings a powerful strength of presence to the role. 

But what defines Jobs in this biographical tale is the fast-paced dialogue revealing both his intelligence and his drive as he confidently moves his vision for Apple computers to completion.

This telling of his life focuses on Jobs relationships more than the company he founded, focusing on both his closest business associates as well as his troubled relationship with a daughter he denied was his own. We see the polarity that both thrust him into guru status and plagued his personal life. 

In his business relationships, the central characters focuses first on his co-founder of Apple, Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogan) and then his marketing manager and “business wife” Joanna Hoffman (Kate Winslet). 

With intense loyalty and yet combustive interactions, both were in their own way the very people Jobs needed to fulfill his vision. The fact that he was unable to treat them with the dignity they deserved for their loyal contributions borders on abuse and comes from Jobs's deeply troubled soul.

However, his self-described “poorly-constructed” soul was most obvious when it came to his relationship with his daughter Lisa Brennan (Makenzie Moss at 5, Ripley Sobo at 9 and Perla Haney-Jardine at 19). 

Jobs met Lisa's mother, Chrisann (Katherine Waterston), in High School. Their relationship never included marriage and when she became pregnant he denied paternity. 

In court Jobs’s paternity was proven at the 94.1 percent level, but he asserted that this 6 percent question could mean that 28 million men in America could be her father. 

The effect this had on his relationship with Lisa is powerfully presented as he became a huge success and yet did little to care for Lisa or her mother.

His self-absorbed distrust of others was also shown in his relationship with Apple’s CEO John Sculley (Jeff Daniels). Jobs wooed Sculley away from Pepsi and trusted him as a father figure, but their relationship was destroyed when the company faltered and Sculley and Jobs had a showdown with the board. 

Although Sculley won that battle, he lost the war and eventually led the company into a position where they needed Jobs’s entrepreneurial abilities that could produce the cutting-edge products needed in the expanding world of personal computers and technologies.

It is often true that troubled people have a singular ability to see the world and do great things. That they sometimes suffer interpersonally and end up struggling in every relationship is the journey Steve Jobs took. 

That we can learn from him is obvious, and that he needed loving care is just as clear. 

It is these lessons that make this an engaging film.

Discussion

» The film presents Jobs's pain as an adopted child that fueled the drive to create something that would be a work of art and transform humanity. Do you accept this explanation?  Why do you answer as you do?

» His lack of civility and compassion is difficult to watch. Do you believe this strengthened or harmed this presentation of Jobs?

» The moment of confrontation by Joanna requiring Jobs to be reconciled with his daughter implies that he would not have done so without her ultimatum. Do you believe that to be true? Why do you answer as you do?

» Are you an Apple computer person or a PC person? Why did you make the choice you did and how would this film help you understand that choice?

— Cinema in Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary. Hal Conklin is a former mayor of Santa Barbara and Denny Wayman is pastor of Free Methodist Church, 1435 Cliff Drive. For more reviews, visit www.cinemainfocus.com, or follow them on Twitter: @CinemaInFocus. The opinions expressed are their own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.