Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, December 12 , 2018, 3:17 am | Fair 41º


City Forbids Discussion on Santa Barbara Gang Injunction at Advisory Meeting

Members of Santa Barbara’s Neighborhood Advisory Council wanted to hear presentations from both sides of the gang injunction debate, but when it came to the opposition, city staff members forbade any questions or discussion during the May 14 meeting.

Eleven out of the 13 members live within the proposed safety zones of the gang injunction, NAC member Sebastian Aldana pointed out. The majority of City Council members do not.

There was a presentation on the gang injunction about 18 months ago from now-retired Santa Barbara police Capt. Armando Martel and Sgt. Noel Rivas, Aldana said.

The NAC asked questions, discussed the issue and voted to have a presentation from the other side, explaining the potential impacts to the neighborhoods.

Three presenters were turned down for being more about “bashing” than information, and they eventually settled on NAC member and youth advocate Christy Haynes, Aldana said.

There was a catch — the presentation could only happen if the NAC agreed not to ask questions or discuss the issue at all during the meeting.

As part of the agenda committee, Aldana agreed to it — not happily — because he thought the committee needed the information.

“It was just …” he sighed. “Is it fair? I would say no. I just feel we should be able to present it providing we do it properly.”

He added: “There’s nothing we could do about the 11 people left on the list, but we can inform the residents of what’s going on in their neighborhoods and how they’ll be affected.”

The NAC already feels left out of the conversation, because the City Council has never asked for a recommendation and never held any informational or outreach meetings on the topic, he said.

This advisory group’s mission, after all, is to “provide a vehicle for community input,” and help meet the needs of the targeted neighborhoods — the Eastside, Laguna, Westside and downtown.

“I was a little shocked, to be honest with you, that the city had not asked for us to have any dialogue on this topic,” said Haynes, who joined the NAC this year. “If the neighborhood outreach council is really there to advise city staff and the City Council on challenges in our at-risk neighborhoods, including youth violence, I am just curious and want to understand better why we were not part of this discussion. Why were we told this was not in our purview?”

She was asked to do a small presentation on the “alternate perspective” with strict guidelines, and no one was allowed to ask questions afterward.

Instead, she gave out her personal email address to anyone who wanted to follow up.

NAC members believe the city administration had a hand in this rule because staff members kept saying the gang injunction was in litigation, so they had to be careful, Haynes said.

Haynes’ presentation explained the legal document, the status of the trial, and handed out impact information written by Tom Parker, a retired FBI agent who has spoken against the injunction.

She also sent out a Department of Justice document about approaches to prevent gang membership, which doesn’t include injunctions.

The gang injunction is in trial before Superior Court Judge Colleen Sterne, who will grant or deny the petition.

City staff members made a mistake in limiting the NAC’s discussion, Parks and Recreation Director Nancy Rapp said this week.

Staff working with the NAC include Mark Alvarado of Neighborhood & Outreach Services, who handles agenda-setting with the NAC agenda committee.

The NAC members should have been able to ask questions and discuss the issue like any other informational agenda item, Rapp said.

“When I became aware of the situation, I realized that we had a staff error,” she said.

She took responsibility, saying there was a lack of clear direction to staff and some misunderstandings.

“It’s one of those challenges that we have sometimes with advisory groups and staff, and there’s not quite as much experience as other staff who deal with these things more frequently,” she said.

“I had some raised eyebrows when I realized what had happened, as did others, I’m sure.”

The gang injunction has been “emotional on a number of levels,” and she talked to staff to clarify the rules, Rapp said.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >