Saturday, June 23 , 2018, 3:43 pm | Overcast with Haze 67º


Local News

Facing the Promise of a Lawsuit, Santa Barbara Council Sets Workshop on Election Options

Attorney Barry Cappello represents advocates pushing for a district voting system to improve representation for residents who feel disenfranchised

With the promise of a lawsuit on the way, the Santa Barbara City Council on Tuesday decided to hold a workshop to talk about district elections, a hybrid system and other options to improve representation for people who feel disenfranchised under the at-large system.

Mayor Helene Schneider and Councilman Bendy White brought the item to the full council on Tuesday even though they’re both skeptical that district elections would work here. They proposed a hybrid system with four districts, two at-large council members and an at-large mayor, but there was no support for putting that on November’s ballot, which is an option.

The council reached consensus to take time examining all of the elections options, including a move to even-numbered years when turnout is higher, and voted to schedule a workshop in May.

Councilman Gregg Hart said the discussion will take more than a few months, and the community can’t go through engagement and rich debate by the end of June.

White said he wants the city to be leading the discussion, but it’s hard to believe Tuesday’s agenda item was anything but a response to the impending litigation by a group of district election advocates.

Former councilman Leo Martinez, Zona Seca Executive Director Frank Banales and others are represented by local attorney Barry Cappello in this fight.

They have a problem with the historically monochromatic council and believe Santa Barbara has polarized voting, with Latinos being underrepresented. There have been only a handful of Latino council members in the past 50 years while 38 percent of the city’s population is Latino, they said in a public forum this February.

Councilwoman Cathy Murillo, a Mexican-American, is the exception that proves the rule, Cappello told the City Council.

Cappello, who served as city attorney in the 1970s, said the city changed from district elections to an at-large system just before his tenure. Since then, many citizens feel their voices aren’t being heard and what their neighborhoods want — street lighting, fixed bridges and sidewalks — isn’t being delivered.

He argued that courts have thrown out hybrid systems in favor of district elections. He said the city can decide whether to fight the lawsuit or take a district-election model to the voters.


Barry Cappello
Attorney Barry Cappello tells the Santa Barbara council on Tuesday that he is preparing a lawsuit to show the city needs district elections for Latinos to get fair representation. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

“That’s not a threat, that’s just good advice,” Cappello said.

Councilman Frank Hotchkiss said it’s a “moot claim” to say some areas are underrepresented. Only the Eastside has its own library and police substation, and he said the council has approved capital projects in every neighborhood.

“I don’t think any part of the city is underrepresented at all,” Hotchkiss said.

Cappello asked if the Montecito Bridge project and others were brought forward because this issue has been percolating in the community, and Hotchkiss said no, which is when Schneider cut in to stop them from arguing.

Activists Mickey and Richard Flacks asked the council to look at all ways to increase engagement and participation. The voter turnout is much lower for areas with minority and low-income residents than the city overall, Mickey Flacks pointed out.

Sebastian Aldana Jr., an active resident of the Eastside and a member of the Neighborhood Advisory Council, pointed to bridge replacement projects in different parts of the city. One on Chapala Street near West Beach is “beautiful” with new landscaping, trash cans and lights, while the Punta Gorda bridge is “demolished, blocked off and abandoned,” he said. The Cacique Street bridge was washed away and only got a pedestrian walkway added recently.

“In my opinion, with proper representation the two bridges on the Eastside would not be in that situation,” he said.

Schneider countered that the city has put in dozens of curb cuts in the last few years and that the lower Mission Creek bridge replacement project has been in the works for 50 years.

City Attorney Ariel Calonne said Cappello “didn’t threaten a lawsuit — he promised one.”

State law stacks the deck against at-large election systems and if polarized voting can be proven, courts often impose district elections, he said.

At the end of the meeting, Murillo asked Cappello to set the lawsuit aside.

“You made your point,” she said. “You have our attention.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >