Monday, June 18 , 2018, 2:54 pm | Fair 69º


Local News

Planning Commission Vote Delays Santa Maria Energy Pipeline Project

Oil company 'disappointed' with county officials' decision to raise the carbon-emissions threshold

Santa Maria Energy has been fighting for approval of its oil pipeline project for more than three years, but the way in which Santa Barbara County officials voted to move forward with the project Wednesday evoked nothing short of disappointment.

While the county Planning Commission voted 3-2 on Wednesday to approve the Orcutt project, commissioners altered and made stricter a staff-recommended carbon-emissions threshold.

The change, opposed by commissioners Dan Blough and Larry Ferini, makes the commission approval tentative and subject to further delay via recirculation of an environmental impact report.

“We’re disappointed,” Beth Marino, Santa Maria Energy’s vice president of legal and corporate affairs, told Noozhawk after the vote.

In 2009, the North County oil company began a lengthy approval process to install 136 production oil wells, connecting pipelines and other oil equipment in its Orcutt location.

A related project includes installing an 8-mile underground, recycled water pipeline to the Laguna County Sanitation District.

The privately held oil company, founded in 2002, extracts oil from 75 wells drilled into Monterey Shale and 26 wells drilled into a diatomite layer in Santa Barbara County on 4,000 leased acres at the Orcutt Field. The company uses cyclic steam injection to extract oil because the steam heats the oil in a well to a temperature that produces flow.

Commissioners considered the project Wednesday after continuing the decision last week so that staff could better address environmental impacts, including oil seeps, a western location alternative, oak tree removal, native grasslands and the emissions threshold.

Emissions — the main sticking point last week — again dominated discussion.

Santa Maria Energy supporters maintained that commissioners could determine an emissions threshold on a case-by-case basis, in this particular situation setting the 62,480 metric tons threshold per year, or a 29-percent capture.

Environmentalists said they appreciated sincere efforts made by the oil company, but reiterated last week’s fears that commissioners would be setting an unofficial precedent for emissions standards used in future projects.

Some recommended zero emissions or at least a 90-percent capture, or 10,000 metric tons per year.

What the commission tentatively approved was a 50-percent threshold.

Commissioners said they agreed on all points of the staff report, minus the emissions, and did not want to intentionally delay the project longer.

Blough went so far as to recommend the commission either try to make a motion to approve the project without setting an emissions threshold – leaving that for the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors – or to approve a different emissions threshold without re-circulating the environmental report to public.

“I think it’s right when we have a decision to make and we’re not in agreement,” Blough said of sending the emissions decision up to supervisors. “We’re not the elected people. We’re the appointed people. Let’s get it there now.”

County legal counsel cautioned that moving forward without recirculation would open the commission up to a lawsuit. Blough responded that he believed the commission could be sued in either scenario.

After Ferini and Blough failed to pass the staff recommended 29-percent threshold in a 2-3 vote, the remaining commissioners voted in favor of taking more time to examine environmental effects.

Commissioner C. Michael Cooney asked for Santa Maria Energy’s patience so that a “greater consensus” could be gathered.

After the vote, Marino said she couldn’t say whether operating under the new emissions levels was possible or realistic.

She said oil company officials would continue working and waiting what would likely be months until the project is readdressed.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >