Thursday, October 27 , 2016, 1:11 am | A Few Clouds 55º


Local News

County Continues Hearing on Santa Maria Energy Pipeline Project

Planning commissioners request another week to examine environmental impacts

Santa Maria Energy officials must wait at least another week before they can move forward with a proposed oil pipeline project, following the Santa Barbara County Planning Commission vote Wednesday to continue a decision for final approval.

How to best mitigate potential effects on the environment caused the five-member commission to vote 4-0 to continue a decision until next Wednesday’s meeting.

Commissioner Daniel Blough abstained from the vote because “I’m actually prepared to move the project forward today,” he said.

The delay tacks an additional week of planning review and consideration of public comment onto the 3½ years that Santa Maria Energy has already been waiting for a go-ahead.

In 2009, the North County oil company began a lengthy approval process to install 136 production oil wells, connecting pipelines and other oil equipment in its Orcutt location. A related project includes installing an eight-mile underground, recycled water pipeline to the Laguna County Sanitation District.

The privately held oil company, founded in 2002, extracts oil from 75 wells drilled into Monterey Shale and 26 wells drilled into a diatomite layer in Santa Barbara County on 4,000 leased acres at the Orcutt Field. The company uses cyclic steam injection to extract oil because the steam heats the oil in a well to a temperature that produces flow.

Planning commission staff on Wednesday spent three hours presenting information in the hope that commissioners would certify the environmental impact report and approve a comprehensive plan for an easement and a fee ownership for certain portions of privately owned properties for placement of the recycled water pipeline.

Planning staff, along with Santa Maria Energy and Laguna district staff, explained that the economic and environmental benefits of the project — including creating high-paying jobs and jump-starting local commerce — far outweighed any potential drawbacks. Pipeline monitoring systems were also discussed.

Article Image
(Santa Maria Energy graphic)

Possible impacts identified in the environmental report included oil spills, seeps and greenhouse gas emissions. 

Most of the 24 public speakers during the hearing were in favor of the project, many noting that they’ve taken a tour of the facility because of Santa Maria Energy’s transparent outreach to the community.

Santa Maria residents joined Santa Barbara stakeholders in the County Engineering Building via web camera.

Six speakers, including representatives from local environmental groups, said they were not against the project so much as wary of commissioners setting a precedent of not monitoring a proper emissions threshold by establishing standards on a case-by-case basis.

“Don’t rush to judgment,” said Linda Krop, chief counsel for the Environmental Defense Center. “It is feasible to mitigate these impacts.”

Although members of the planning commission called Santa Maria Energy a “model candidate,” most wanted an additional week to vet environment impacts.

“All my questions haven’t been answered,” Commissioner Cecilia Brown said.

The planning commission is scheduled to consider the item again at 9 a.m. next Wednesdayin the County Engineering Building.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >