Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 1:04 am | Fair 57º


Local News

County Slams Environmental Review of Chumash Camp 4 Project

Santa Barbara County officials sent a 55-page letter to a federal agency on Friday, maintaining that not enough environmental review has been done to fully measure the impacts on the Santa Ynez Valley if a development by the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians were to go forward.

The Camp 4 fee-to-trust proposal involves 1,433 acres in the center of the Santa Ynez Valley currently zoned exclusively for agriculture, but the tribe has expressed intentions to develop the area for housing and other uses. 

"The project proposes 143 residential dwellings ranging from 3,000 to 5,000 square feet, as well as an on-site wastewater treatment plant, roads, and other infrastructure on a largely pristine set of parcels that are home to an intact, self-sustaining oak woodland and active agriculture," according to a letter from county CEO Mona Miyasato sent to Amy Dutschke at the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Miyasato stated that the county asked the federal government to prepare a complete environmental impact statement for Camp 4, "at a time when relevant environmental impacts can be fully analyzed — at or near the end of the contractual restrictions on the land on Dec. 31, 2022, when the parcel's Williamson Act contract expires.

Miyasato said an environmental assessment is appropriate only "where no effect on the environment is possible," and that an environmental impact statement for Camp 4 must be prepared.

Officials from the tribe did not respond directly to the question of environmental review, but noted that the county has turned down offers from the Chumash to pay for police and fire protection.

"The county’s opposition is not a 'resource' issue, but rather only a smoke screen for their opposition to all tribal projects," Tribal Chairmam Vince Armenta said in a statement. "Camp 4 will be a first-class housing development that will be as good if not superior in quality and design than that of our neighbors who oppose Camp 4. The tribe’s commitment to high quality has been proven again and again by our award-winning properties."

The tribe's application proposes significant residential and related development on five different parcels of land making up 1,433 acres in the valley beginning in 2023, the county maintains.

"Camp 4 would be the largest and most significant development in the valley in the last 50 years, yet the environmental review for the project, the environmental assessment remains wholly inadequate," the county's letter stated.

The county maintains that the document uses a present day baseline for a development that won't proceed for almost a decade because of the contractual restrictions on the land.

"Doing so almost certainly understates many of Camp 4’s impacts on environmental resources," the comments said.

In March 2013, the tribe submitted a consolidation plan that included about 11,500 acres of the Santa Ynez Valley, including Camp 4.

The BIA approved the consolidation plan in June 2013, and several parties, including the county, appealed the decision. In July 2013, the tribe submitted an application for transfer of title for fee lands into trust for Camp 4.

Last fall, the tribe withdrew its consolidation plan, and the BIA dismissed the pending appeals. The tribe prepared and submitted a revised application for Camp 4 that removed references of the consolidation plans.

As of May 2014, the BIA released the environmental assessment for that application, and the comment deadline expires on Monday.

The county's letter also states that the application is inconsistent with local zoning ordinances and other county codes, and "greatly exceeds the allowable uses and densities for the area."

One of the points of contention made by the county is that the tribe currently has an approximately 138-acre reservation to accommodate its 136 tribal members.

The environmental documents don't explain why a re-build of the existing reservation isn't a reasonable alternative, and "redeveloping the existing residential area on the reservation with a mixed-use, higher density 143 unit housing development would limit environmental impacts and address housing needs," the letter stated.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >