Pixel Tracker

Sunday, December 16 , 2018, 5:33 pm | Fair 58º


Santa Barbara County Supervisors Comment on Next Year’s Budget Planning

Santa Barbara County officials on Friday lamented what are sure to be difficult decisions heading into the budget-crafting process, but most didn’t tip their hats to which requests they care about most.

Friday marked the end of three days of budget workshops for the county Board of Supervisors, which listened to a long list of “asks” from county departments.

No layoffs are anticipated over the next two years, but limited resources mean not every department can add employees or expand services.

From the dais, Fourth District Supervisor Peter Adam and Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf were the only officials to provide wish lists of their own.

“For me, the whole purpose of this week is to lay out priorities,” Adam said, noting his No. 1 priority is devoting the $1 million in funding to keep the Santa Maria Branch Jail open.

Wolf favored bolstering the Clerk-Recorder and Assessor departments ahead of the fall election and continuing progress in certain areas of County Public Health, such as animal services, among other desires.

As in most years, departments asked for more money than the board can divvy up come June, when final budget decisions will be made.

Overall, department heads asked for $17.3 million more in ongoing funding and $11.8 million in one-time funding.

The county anticipates being $6 million in the black by the end of the fiscal year June 30, with $4.6 million of that as ongoing savings.

On Friday, as the supervisors heard from the Auditor-Controller, Treasurer-Tax-Collector, County CEO’s Office and others, Fifth District Supervisor Steve Lavagnino said he, too, was compiling a list.

The supervisors thanked County CEO Mona Miyasato and staff for presenting critical information, but Lavagnino said he was frustrated staff couldn’t provide an exact dollar amount up for grabs.

“We can do all these budget workshops until we’re blue in the face,” he said, adding that he wanted more information to bring to his constituents.

Lavagnino also questioned just how “strategic” the county’s $31 million strategic reserve (8 percent of the total budget) is, considering most capital projects will only get more expensive as they’re put off.

Adam agreed, with County Counsel Michael Ghizzoni noting a healthy reserve makes the county look good when applying for project loans (that could then have lower interest payments).

County Planning and Development Director Glenn Russell said his department’s highest priorities were getting air conditioning for the County Engineering Building ($1.62 million) and adding security measures for public counters, hearing rooms and staff offices in Santa Barbara and Santa Maria ($220,000).

He asked the supervisors to give direction on which long-range planning projects a limited number of staff should focus on, getting a unanimous vote to continue as is while pushing a countywide outdoor lighting ordinance update ($59,000) into the following year’s budget.

Overall, the supervisors said they thought the draft budget kept the county on the same positive, forward-looking path.

“We’ve come a long way in just five years,” Miyasato said of stable finances and a moderate growth rate.

The county is making headway to address millions in deferred maintenance and pension responsibilities, she said, noting that covering pension might be an issue come 2017-18.

An increase in violent crime in Santa Maria is having a ripple effect across other departments, which is where she said the budget could shore up holes.

Miyasato recommended the board keep the Santa Maria Branch Jail open as the County Sheriff’s Department struggles to fill vacant positions, and to pay for a North County Jail project with construction bids that have come in $11 million over the budgeted $67 million.

Strengthening mental health services, recruitment efforts and finding new revenue sources were other priorities.

Adam said he wouldn’t commit to giving Sheriff Bill Brown more funded vacant positions, but spoke favorably of hiring sheriff service technicians to lighten the mandatory-overtime load.

He emphasized the need to put deferred maintenance high on the county’s to-do list, along with unfunded pension liabilities and other post-employment benefits.

“This year we are set to make the same mistakes as last year,” he said, wishing the county CEO luck after saying hiring her in 2013 was one of the best decisions the board has made.

Miyasato will be back with a recommended budget May 12, with budget hearings scheduled for June 15-17.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.