Thursday, April 26 , 2018, 5:15 pm | Fair 61º


Craig Allen: Russell 2000 May Be Early Indicator for Market Direction

In last week’s column, we looked at the NASDAQ Composite Index and its recent divergence from the other two major indexes — the Standard & Poor’s 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average. The Nasdaq has been showing clear signs of weakness, just as the other two indexes have been pushing to new all-time highs, all of this occurring as earnings season and GDP growth have reflected marked weakness, as well.

As all of this has been unfolding, the Russell 2000 — the small company stock index — has been showing clear signs of a significant correction, a correction that could be a precursor to a major correction for the broader stock market.

From the March 4 high of 1,213, the Russell 2000 has declined to 1,107 as of Friday’s close, or by 106 points/8.7 percent. During the same time frame, the S&P 500 has experienced almost no change, trading sideways to 1,878 from 1,874.

Most concerning, if you happen to be long in the market, is the double bottom forming at the ~1,080 level. Should the Russell 2000 penetrate this level, we could easily see this index drop well below the critical 1,000 level.

Small companies tend to be the first to begin moving higher as recessions come to an end. This was certainly the case at the end of the recession that followed closely behind the financial crisis of 2008-2009. In fact, the Russell 2000 set an intraday low of 342 on March 9, and since has returned 255 percent, outperforming the Dow, S&P 500 and even the Nasdaq Composite during the five-year-plus bull market.

The recent, nearly 9 percent pull-back in the Russell is even more concerning since small companies tend to be the most sensitive to changing economic conditions. With the most recent measure of GDP growth for the first quarter of 2014 scarcely beating the flat line, coming in at just 0.1 percent annualized growth, it is no mystery why the Russell has shown such poor performance. What is a mystery is why the Dow and S&P 500 have been hitting new highs!

Last week’s column about the Nasdaq Composite and this week’s exploration of the Russell 2000 are part of an effort to determine market direction. We all want to know what the market will do next! As a professional portfolio manager, my business depends on my ability to make valued judgments, based on extensive analysis of historical, current and future trends. In my personal experience, when divergences occur, often the market is signaling a change in direction.

We now have both the Russell 2000 and the Nasdaq Composite diverging from the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average. We also have weakening earnings and GDP while the major stock indexes — the Dow and S&P 500 — are setting new, all-time highs. These conflicting signals must get resolved one way or another: Either earnings and GDP will rebound, confirming that the Dow and S&P 500 have been right to continue the bull market rally, or weakness will continue, confirming that the Russell 2000 and Nasdaq Composite are correct, resulting in a sizable correction in the broader market indexes (the Dow and S&P 500).

If the Russell and Nasdaq are correct, and they are signaling a major correction, those companies that have the highest valuations, and those that have increased in price but have poor fundamentals, will be the stocks that get hit the hardest. Investors should immediately review their portfolio holdings to determine the risk of each position and take appropriate action by reducing or eliminating those positions most vulnerable to a correction in the broader market.

It is always difficult to take decisive action to sell positions that have been increasing portfolio values. However, markets do not and will not continue to advance indefinitely. The Nasdaq is trading at 35 times earnings — about twice the price-earnings ratio of the S&P 500. This means that the Nasdaq represents far more potential downside risk, should the overall market experience a serious correction, than the S&P 500.

Because the Nasdaq is technology-heavy, and the advance of technology stocks is a significant reason that the valuation of the Nasdaq is so high, we should expect to see technology stocks bear the brunt of a correction. The Russell 2000, even after an 8.7 percent correction from that March 4 high, is trading at 97 times earnings. One can easily see the risk associated with small companies, should we experience a major correction.

A prudent investor is continuously measuring and evaluating the risk/reward ratio within his or her portfolio. In the simplest terms, the stock market today reflects a very poor reward for the amount of risk involved in owning stocks. Investors should be realistic about their expectations for further upside potential from current levels and the potential for downside, and should take decisive, effective action to reduce risk and safeguard profits.

Craig Allen, CFA, CFP, CIMA, is president of Montecito Private Asset Management LLC and founder of Dump That Debt. He has been managing assets for foundations, corporations and high-net worth individuals for more than 20 years and is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA charter holder), a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and holds the Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA) certification. He blogs at Finance With Craig Allen and can be contacted at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or 805.898.1400. Click here to read previous columns or follow him on Twitter: @MPAMCraig. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >