Thursday, July 19 , 2018, 11:14 pm | A Few Clouds 65º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Criminal Trial for Solvang Animal Rescue Facility Operator Starts Monday

A trial for a Solvang animal rescue operator facing misdemeanor criminal charges will open Monday with selection of 12 jurors and a couple of alternates.

Julia Di Sieno Click to view larger
Julia Di Sieno, operator of Animal Rescue Team in the Santa Ynez Valley, is facing more than a half-dozen criminal charges. (Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department photo)

Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge James Rigali, who normally presides over civil matters, met with attorneys Friday morning to confirm that the trial for 57-year-old Julia Di Sieno would start Monday.

Rigali ended up with the case after the defense refused to waive time for a speedy trial while the original judge is in the midst of a lengthy homicide trial.

Di Sieno, who operates the Animal Rescue Team at 875 Carriage Drive, just outside Solvang city limits, was first charged with two counts of stalking and making criminal threats against neighbors Mary and Richard Nohr.

Ordered to surrender her firearms in connection with the original case, Di Sieno allegedly failed to do so and landed in trouble again when deputies seized several weapons and ammunition.

Four additional criminal charges — unlawful firearms act violation of a restraining order, possession of a deadly weapon, and two counts of contempt of court for disobeying a court order — were filed against Di Sieno, and those cases were consolidated into one.

Among pre-trial issues handled Friday, Rigali asked why two newer misdemeanor charges — stemming from another incident involving a different neighbor — had not been added to the case.

“It would be too easy, I guess,” he remarked.

The attorneys said the circumstances involving the original eight charges were different from those alleged in the newer case.

Rigali ordered the attorneys to return Monday to explain why the two other misdemeanor charges — assault with a deadly weapon and battery — should not be handled in the same trial.

On other motions, Rigali agreed that photos of Di Sieno’s firearms could be presented but not the actual weapons.

Deputy District Attorney Steven Li said he intended to show the weapons as reasons the Nohrs have feared Di Sieno, who had accused them of poisoning her dogs.

Whether neighbors other than the Nohrs can testify about a statement Di Sieno allegedly made remains up in the air.

Li said he intended to call others who will talk about Di Sieno’s allegations that the Nohrs were poisoning her cats, reportedly prompting the defendant to say in March 2017, “You shouldn’t be afraid of my dog, you should be afraid of my gun.”

But defense attorney Kevin Dubrall contended the information was irrelevant to the case.

Rigali seemed skeptical, and said he would hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence to determine whether that testimony is pertinent.

As Rigali spelled out his planned schedule, the attorneys expressed concern due to their duties in a different courtroom. He told them other attorneys in their offices could fill in the other courtoom Tuesday morning, adding, “Trial takes priority.”

Judges and attorneys at the Santa Maria Superior Court Complex have been wrestling with clogged court calendars, complicated by several lengthy murder trials. To help ease the backlog, another criminal trial has been moved to Santa Barbara.

Noozhawk North County editor Janene Scully can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >