Wednesday, August 15 , 2018, 6:40 am | Fair 64º

 
 
 
 

David Harsanyi: Disasters Imminent on Republican Front

There are many potential outcomes to a Donald Trump GOP nomination, and every one of them is a disaster for conservatives.

Fact is, Trump fans will not be placated. Not if they lose, and definitely not if they win. Unless unforeseen events alter the dynamics of American politics, it's difficult to imagine conventional Republicans and Trump fans inhabiting the same space after this is all done.

Me? I look forward to loathing three major political parties.

Now, if Trump prevails in the primaries, principled small-government conservatives (however many are left) will be faced with a distasteful choice: They can either back the nominee, picked fairly by the rank-and-file of the party, or they can disregard party politics and actively try and sink him.

If they support Trump? A disaster. Those who decide to endorse Trump because of partisan loyalty will also be supporting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese goods, policies barring immigrants based purely on religion and whatever other half-baked policy ideas spring from Trump's mind.

And they should be really comfortable with Trumpism (and with that his many liberal positions) because they'll be spending the rest of their careers justifying the support.

For those who think they can embrace neutrality to escape this fight, their silence will be treated as tacit endorsement by liberals and treachery by Trump's fans. It's conceivable that a number of local races will suffer in these intraparty skirmishes, hurting conservatives in state races and probably Congress.

If they fight Trump? A disaster. For those who decide to actively oppose Trump — and you assume many factions on the right would — the prospects are not much better.

There's no modern precedent for a party's establishment undercutting its nominee, so it's improbable the Republican Party would participate in torpedoing Trump. The time for that has passed.

(One day perhaps, Reince Priebus will explain how he let a populist liberal reality-show host win a major party's nomination.)

More distressingly, at least for some of us, is the prospect that Trump's outlook will turn out to be more popular than anyone imagines.

Maybe a flood of candidates will begin aping his populism and succeed. Maybe Trump begins to transform American discourse into something more closely resembling European politics, where nationalists and socialists argue about who should run the state apparatus.

Many conservatives will undoubtedly toy with the idea of running a third-party candidate (not as easy as it sounds, when you consider the logistics and the factional nature of Republicans today), which would likely only exist to spoil the GOP nominee's prospects and challenge his risible claim to conservatism.

The important question for conservatives is: Would they rather a have Republican president with views antithetical to their own or Hillary Clinton as president?

Would they rather have a Republican who may cause irreparably damage to their brand, or Bernie Sanders?

Would they want a GOP monopoly in D.C., led by Trump, or continue with gridlock as the purer opposition party?

Though, you imagine that helping put Clinton (or Sanders) in the White House would blow up any hope of a healthy right-of-center consensus for many years to come.

If Trump loses? A disaster. If conservative intellectuals and many of their institutions and leaders fail to back the nominee, Trump's fans will hold those elites culpable for the loss, further feeding the frustrations that had alienated them in the first place.

The idea that a bunch of know-it-alls can undermine the democratic process will only generate more anger and paranoia. Do Trump boosters seem like the sort of group that will embrace rapprochement and constructive change after having an election stolen from them?

Even more terrifying for many of us is the prospect of a successful Trump presidency. Even without Congress, as Obama has shown, a president can accomplish many destructive things, though probably not enough to satisfy Trump's supports, who will undoubtedly be disappointed.

Presidents can't just slap huge tariffs on other countries without Congress, and they can't make Mexico pay for border fences, nor take oil form countries in the Middle East, nor deport 13 million immigrants here illegally.

When this becomes a reality, I suspect his fans will still blame the establishment for its lack of willpower, support and patriotism.

And, of course, finally, Trump might lose the GOP nomination (I still don't believe he'll win, but I'm cognizant of the fact that this is probably wishful thinking.)

Then, it's likely that the Republican Party will go back to business as usual, which is a disaster of whole different kind.

David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him, follow him on Twitter: @davidharsanyi, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >