Monday, September 24 , 2018, 6:58 pm | Fair 65º

 
 
 
 

Diane Dimond: 9-1-1 System, On Call to Help, Needs Help of Its Own

Each day across this country, lives are saved because a dedicated 9-1-1 operator dispatched emergency personnel to help a panicked person. Every year there are some 240 million urgent calls made to this “one nation, one number” system. The value of the 9-1-1 organization is beyond question.

But how many times have you heard a recording of a 9-1-1 call in which the operator seems bored, uninterested or downright rude?

The latest incident occurred when a 14-year-old called from the back seat of a car to report her father and his fiancée had been struck by a hit-and-run driver while changing a tire. Sitting alone on the Baltimore-Washington Beltway, she and her little brother were scared to death.

“They are just laying here. Nothing. They are just laying here,” she sobbed.

“OK, let’s stop whining. Let’s stop whining. It’s hard to understand you,” the uncompassionate-sounding operator told her. And then when she continued to beg for help to come he scolded her in a dismissive tone.

“Let’s stop worrying about ‘hurry up and get there’ ... we’re already on our way.” The young girl’s father died at the scene. His fiancée was seriously injured, but survived.

There has got to be a better, more compassionate way to handle calls from people who are experiencing the worst moments of their life. Something more than an operator’s condescending and repetitive admonition to, “Calm down, calm down ...” as heard on so many of these 9-1-1 tapes.

Dr. Brian Russell, a psychologist who has worked with law enforcement, believes operators need to learn to think like the victim they’re talking to. The rote message to “calm down” is the wrong one.

“There’s a reasonable chance that you’re going to hear that as me (the operator) minimizing what you’re experiencing,” Russell said during a conversation from his Kansas headquarters. “And if so, there’s a reasonable chance that you’re going to become even more emotional in your desperation to get me to understand how bad the situation is.”

There are countless examples of callers becoming more and more agitated as the 9-1-1 operator dispassionately asks questions. Many times the operator doesn’t bother to tell the caller that help is already on the way, leaving them ever more frantic and believing the seriousness of the situation is not being understood.

Time is the enemy in all these situations, so getting a proper location of the emergency — be it a crime-in-progress, a fire or the need for medical rescue — should be paramount.

Yet one widely referenced dispatcher-training manual suggests this order of questioning:

» What happened?

» Weapons?

» When did it occur?

» Where did it happen?

» Suspect description?

There is no national protocol on how to question a caller, but departments using this training method (offered in 2013 by the National Emergency Number Association) may be wasting valuable time by not asking for an address until question No. 4.

Russell thinks one of the first things an operator should say — in a composed and empathetic sounding way — is a question like, “Let’s figure out where you are so I can send you help.” He stresses that callers might very well be in shock and may have to be asked several times before it "registers” with them.

I’d like to see operators who get exasperated with sobbing, cursing or rambling callers retrained, suspended or even fired if they do it repeatedly. I’d like to see better personality screening at the point of hire. Paying operators more might attract more suitable applicants.

None of this is to say there aren’t wonderful 9-1-1 operators out there. I’ve listened to countless recordings of heroic conversations. An operator in Iowa helped a woman trapped in a runaway SUV traveling at speeds of up to 119 mph successfully disable the vehicle and walk away. An operator in Kentucky helped a frantic mother save her 17-month-old baby whose eyes had rolled back in her head. And there are too many instances to mention where a 9-1-1 operator successfully handled a call from a child reporting an incapacitated parent.

But it’s those cringe-worthy calls like the “stop whining” one we remember. They embarrass their departments and, worse yet, expose cities to multimillion-dollar lawsuits. Many filed by members of minority communities — the very group, according to Russell, that law enforcement cannot afford to offend.

We all pay for the sins of the 9-1-1 operator who responds poorly. We should all demand they do better.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >