Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, December 12 , 2018, 2:28 am | Fair 45º


Diane Dimond: Brain Disease, Football and the NFL’s Culpability

It was the admission that made every parent of every kid who wants to play football gasp.

The question from Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., was simple: “Do you think there is a link between football and degenerative brain disorders like CTE?”

Jeff Miller, the National Football League’s senior vice president for health and safety, assured that “the answer to that question is certainly yes.”

Wow. Now, it doesn’t take a modern Albert Einstein to know that repeated solid blows to a person’s head will cause problems. (Think of the punch-drunk syndrome that was originally discovered in boxers in the 1920s, officially called dementia pugilistica.)

Miller’s comment, however, marked the first time ever that the NFL acknowledged a link between football injuries and brain disease.

For decades, the league repressed information about what long-term physical damage concussions and brain-jostling head hits might do to its players.

The scientific evidence and legal backlash against the NFL’s decades of denial is now coming so fast and furious that it’s hard to keep track of it all.

The New York Times reported in February that more than 100 former players, including at least seven Hall of Famers, have suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which is now seen as the signature football brain disease, and so far it can only be discovered after death.

Families of dozens of CTE-afflicted players have revealed agonizing details of the players’ last days — days filled with depression, confusion, frightening mood swings, anger and even suicide.

Late last month, The Times also reported that the NFL’s research of concussions from 1996-2001 was flawed: At least 100 diagnosed concussions were omitted from the studies.

By the way, these studies concluded that there was no solid scientific proof that brain injuries sustained by repeated blows to the head result in long-term harm to players. Elliot Pellman, the NFL’s top medical adviser, wrote that “many NFL players can be safely allowed to return to play on the day of injury.”

Obviously, we now know that finding was untrue.

It all reminds me of Big Tobacco’s repeated denials about the health risks of cigarettes. They spent years pointing to the lack of definitive science linking the two. We all know how that turned out.

To be fair, scientific research on what causes CTE and other brain diseases, such as Parkinson’s, Lou Gehrig’s disease and Alzheimer’s in athletes is still in its infancy, but many doctors at prominent research hospitals are quick to say that anyone playing a sport that jostles the head — like football, hockey, rugby or soccer — runs a risk.

All these latest revelations add to the popular opinion that the NFL is an organization that cares more about its multibillion-dollar bottom line than the health of its players.

Does that make the NFL legally culpable for enticing its players with multimillion-dollar contracts at the expense of their health?

You bet it is. More than 5,000 former players filed suits against the league for hiding the potential dangers of concussions.

U.S. District Court Judge Anita Brody last year approved a settlement that is estimated to cost the NFL $900 million or more. The final deal granted up to $4 million of compensation to the families of players who died with CTE.

But get this: The compensation will only be given if the player perished between 2006 and July 7, 2014, when Brody granted preliminary approval of the deal.

The family of legendary Frank Gifford, whose autopsy showed he suffered from an advanced case of CTE, will get nothing because he died in August 2015.

The same goes for football great Ken Stabler, who died of colon cancer in July 2015 and was found to have CTE postmortem.

Needless to say, the settlement has been appealed in federal court, and new lawsuits against the league are being filed by players for a variety of claims faster than one can keep track.

Surely the multibillion-dollar enterprise can swat away all legal challenges. They’ll point to the few rule changes they’ve made in the game (like eliminating crown-of-the-head contact outside the tackle box, for example) as proof of their good intentions.

But for those looking for true justice in this saga, realize this: Nearly 112 million people watched the last Super Bowl, a third of the country.

It’s not just that the NFL has turned a blind eye to what it has done to its front-line warriors — millions of us have, too.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >