Pixel Tracker

Thursday, March 21 , 2019, 4:18 am | A Few Clouds 47º

 
 
 
 

Diane Dimond: California’s Cookie-Cutter Justice Isn’t Justice

Conservative-leaning friends are going to tell me I’ve gone off the deep end. My more liberal-minded friends are going to tell me I just don’t get it.

But let me make it clear — one thing I am not is soft on pedophiles. That said, the case of Kevin Rojano-Nieto epitomizes to me how misunderstood our criminal justice system is and how mandatory sentencing guidelines were doomed from the get-go.

The backstory: Veteran Orange County Superior Court Judge M. Marc Kelly knows a bad guy when he sees one. Earlier this month, Rojano-Nieto, now 20, of Santa Ana, was due for sentencing after a jury found him guilty of sodomizing a 3-year-old female relative.

California’s mandatory minimum sentence is 25 years in prison. After hearing all the evidence, Kelly defied that guideline and gave Rojano-Nieto 10 years. 

The lesser sentence coupled with what Kelly said at sentencing has victim rights’ advocates and others screaming for the judge to resign or be recalled from the bench.

Kelly said Rojano-Nieto, who was in a garage playing video games when the tiny child wandered in, “did not appear to consciously intend to harm” her. And even though he covered her mouth so she couldn’t scream out during the attack, the judge concluded he showed, “No violence or callous disregard for (the victim’s) well-being.”

He noted the little girl, who came to court, “Appears to be a happy healthy child ... headed for a normal life,” and said while the crime was “despicable,” to give the defendant 25 years would be “cruel and unusual punishment.”

Outside the courthouse, angry citizens held a news conference. Orange County Supervisor Lisa Bartlett declared the judge “must have forgotten that his job is to protect the victim, not the perpetrator!” Speaker after speaker called for an immediate end to Kelly’s career.

I’m betting none were in court to hear the facts of the case or the victim impact statements or the sentencing. But here are some fast facts:

» The mother of the little girl (also related to the defendant) begged the court for a merciful sentence, citing Rojano-Nieto’s dysfunctional and abusive upbringing.

» The defendant — who expressed extreme remorse and declared, “Despite my actions ... that is not who I am” — had no prior criminal record.

» The court found that, “In an instant, he reacted to a sexual urge and stopped almost immediately ... within seconds of commencing his offense (realizing) the wrongfulness of his act.”

» An independent psychologist concluded the defendant was a low-risk for repeating his behavior. Rojano-Nieto was described as extremely immature, timid and socially withdrawn.

Judges are not supposed to be swayed by outside influence. The purpose for an impartial judge is to rule on each individual case and not resort to one-size-fits-all cookie-cutter justice. Mandatory minimum sentences have erased judges’ discretion and taken this country down an embarrassing road to massive prison over-crowding that’s been condemned worldwide.

Jack Furlong has practiced law for 40 years and is a vocal opponent of mandatory sex-crimes sentences.

“The judge’s job is not to protect victims, as the local supervisors claim,” he told me during a recent conversation. “It is to administer justice, the way they see fit.

“These cases are invariably fact-sensitive, and to make a blanket statement ... (that a person is a) ‘child molester,’ robs all of us of the opportunity to distinguish one case from another.”

Nonetheless, he believes the California prosecutor’s appeal of Kelly’s “illegal” sentence will probably be successful. Young Rojano-Nieto could very well see his sentence upped to 25 years or more.

I wasn’t in that courtroom to hear the evidence, but I’ve covered enough criminal cases to know the difference between a career pedophile propelled by obsession and a horribly stupid mistake made on the spur of the moment.

I also know that 10 years behind bars is a very long time — even for a hardened criminal. Think of the effect a decade would have on a timid young man who made one terrible error that lasted just a few seconds. What kind of man will he be when he finally gets out of prison? Broken and dependent on the state — or angry and full of revenge?

It is distressing that we’ve come to think that if we stomp our feet and yell real loud our deliberative court system can be toppled by our demands. That is not the way it is supposed to work. That is not a path to justice — it’s mob rule.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.