Wednesday, June 20 , 2018, 7:14 pm | Fair 66º


Diane Dimond: Dennis Hastert Molestation Scandal Shows Unequally Applied Justice Is No Justice

Later this month, one of the most powerful men ever to have served in the House of Representatives will face a federal judge to learn his fate.

Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., has pleaded guilty to evading U.S. banking laws, illegally structuring payouts to conceal other crimes and lying to the FBI. But that’s only a small part of his sordid story.

It’s a textbook case of why critics are able to say there is one system of justice for the rich and connected and quite another for the rest of us. It’s also another condemnation of our statute of limitations laws, which say suspects can’t be tried for certain crimes if too much time has passed.

Hastert, the longest-sitting Republican house speaker, came to the attention of the feds after he began systematically to withdraw large sums of cash in 2010. Court documents reveal bank officials first noticed the activity, and under the Patriot Act they were obligated to report the withdrawals to the government.

Court documents also reveal that FBI agents had immediate suspicions:

“What was the actual purpose of withdrawing so much cash and what did defendant do with the money? Was defendant, the former speaker of the United States House of Representatives, a victim of extortion? Was defendant, a lobbyist in communication with domestic and foreign business and political leaders, committing a crime through illegal use of the money?”

By December 2014, the FBI realized Hastert had withdrawn $1.7 million, so they arranged a face-to-face interview. Hastert cryptically told FBI agents he was “not in any kind of trouble.”

He said he was taking cash out because he did not think the banks were safe — and he was keeping the cash “in a safe place,” though he would not specify its location, according to a court filing.

Within a month, a lawyer for Hastert called the FBI to change the story, to explain that the former congressman was, indeed, the victim of an extortion plot. It was agreed that agents would listen in to phone conversations between Hastert and a person referred to as “Individual A.”

It became clear, according to the FBI, that Individual A, who first met Hastert when he was a 14-year-old member of then-coach Hastert’s wrestling team in a small Illinois town, was the real victim — a victim of child sexual abuse at the hands of his coach.

The FBI concluded there was no extortion attempt. Hastert had agreed to pay as much as $3.5 million for the younger man’s silence. That the bank had stumbled upon his withdrawals was his downfall.

The prosecutor in the case now reveals at least three other former students from Hastert’s days as a high school coach in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s have also come forward to say they were sexually abused by the once-popular, championship-winning coach.

One of the students, Steven Reinboldt, has since died, but his sister and three other people told the FBI that he told them long ago that his first gay experience had been with his coach and that Hastert sexually abused him “all through high school.”

In Hastert’s pre-sentencing motion to the court, he expressed “deep regret and remorse for his actions decades ago,” but he does not describe those actions. Hastert also denies Reinboldt’s claim of repeated abuse.

At sentencing later this month, Hastert’s lawyers are sure to bring up his age — 74 — the stroke he suffered last year and his years of public service as mitigating factors.

The prosecution can only ask the court to impose the maximum possible sentence for him: six months in prison.

That’s right. For what the prosecution calls several “known acts” of child molestation, devising an illegal structured payout scheme to hide his ugly secrets and for repeatedly lying to the FBI, John Dennis “Denny” Hastert faces only six months behind bars.

Something tells me because of who he is, or more specifically who he was, he may get off with no prison time at all. The statute of limitations has long since passed.

Unfortunately, the pain caused by Hastert’s actions has not passed. The sister of the deceased Reinboldt and a victim identified only as Individual D reportedly plan to attend the sentencing hearing to deliver victim impact statements.

It won’t constitute real justice, but the truth about Hastert’s actions will finally be on the record.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >