Pixel Tracker

Thursday, March 21 , 2019, 9:57 pm | Partly Cloudy 54º


Diane Dimond: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton Should Fix the Tax Code and Help the Country


It should not have taken a leak of Donald Trump’s 20-year-old tax returns to highlight what’s wrong with America’s tax system.

U.S. citizens have felt the acute unfairness for decades. Who hasn’t looked at their tax refund and wished there were a way to escape the burden?

The way the tax code is written now, people like Trump — and all other Americans who suffer through a year of business losses — are allowed an escape. They get to deduct the amount of their business loss from future tax liability.

Trump did not break any laws when he claimed a reported $916 million in business loss two decades ago. He took advantage of what any other businessperson who went through a rough patch was afforded.

Granted, his write-off was much bigger than most. But let’s get past Trump’s taxes. Let’s talk about the system itself.

The tax code we all labor under was first put together in 1939. There were some major revisions added in 1954 and 1986. And naturally, it has been tinkered with over the years.

At last count, the Internal Revenue Code is about 4 million words long. It is so full of archaic and inane regulations that I dare say there isn’t one person in Washington, D.C., who can be considered an expert.

It’s time for a complete overhaul of the U.S. tax system.

Like many Americans, I cannot decide whom to vote for in November’s presidential election. To put it in the nicest terms I can muster, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump lack the attributes I want in a commander in chief.

But if either come up with a concrete proposal to make our tax system more simple and equitable, I’m there.

Here’s a few starter suggestions. First, let’s go after everyone who owes back taxes and, if possible, get them to pony up. What a concept!

It was reported last year that government workers and retirees owed a collective $3.5 billion in unpaid taxes in 2015. Gee. It’s not like Uncle Sam doesn’t know where the employees work.

Next, a newly released study of Fortune 500 companies concludes that trillions of dollars in corporate earnings are currently being held in offshore accounts and sheltered from U.S. taxes. According to three consumer and taxation groups, if all those companies paid up on their protected profits, the Treasury Department would get a stupendous $717.8 billion windfall.

That’s a lot. But our deficit is currently running at almost $20 trillion.

Only Trump seriously discusses the need to get American companies to stop this tax dodge. But he fails completely to explain how he would change things.

And finally, since my space here is limited, I will offer up my favorite idea: a flat tax — an across-the-board tax on individuals and profitable businesses. No one gets away with paying nothing. Add in a break for families under the poverty line, but have everyone else pay, say, 10 percent or 15 percent of their earned income for the year.

To my mind, the only palatable exception would be the mortgage interest deduction, since that is already calculated in to the price of a home. Imagine more Americans chipping in, no one able to skirt their tax responsibility. This way, the system couldn’t help but be more equitable.

This would require a complete overhaul of our massively complicated tax system. I wonder whether there is a politician who has the guts to propose and push through such a program.

It could be one of the most important economic stimuli this country has ever seen. But we have two candidates who have forgotten what it’s like to live paycheck-to-paycheck.  

Trump says he is worth hundreds of millions — or is it billions of dollars, or gazillions? No one knows for sure. And we still might not be able to figure it out even if he were to release his full income tax returns.

Clinton once famously moaned that she and her husband left the White House in 2001 “not only dead broke, but in debt.” The Clintons are now worth an estimated $110 million.

I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts that both the Clintons’ and the Trumps’ tax preparers take advantage of as many IRS loopholes as legally possible.

So, no matter how much the candidates talk about wanting to help average Americans, they have no personal incentive to erase the U.S. tax code and start over again.

That’s a darn shame. The country would be better for it.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.