Pixel Tracker

Saturday, February 16 , 2019, 1:36 am | Fair 50º


Diane Dimond: Ex-Cons a Forgotten — and Now Manipulated — Voting Bloc

Have you decided who you will vote for in the upcoming presidential election — or whether you’ll vote at all? As you ponder, realize that nearly 6 million Americans will not be allowed to vote this November.

They are citizens who have been convicted of felonies and either live in a state that prohibits ex-cons from ever casting a ballot or a state that requires a years-long waiting period before they are allowed to step foot in a voting booth.

You might be thinking, isn’t voting a constitutional right? Nope. Nowhere in the Constitution is a citizen explicitly guaranteed the right to vote. It is up to each state to set its own voting rules.

The experts who study this stuff call what’s happening to these 6 million citizens disenfranchisement, and they note it hits certain segments of the population particularly hard.

The folks at The Sentencing Project, for example, say that the U.S. justice system has dramatically expanded over the last four decades, and “laws have significantly affected the political voice of many American communities.”

In other words, swaths of urban neighborhoods, specifically those with high concentrations of imprisoned or formerly imprisoned African-Americans, now have a very diminished say in who our next commander in chief will be.

Among the latest statistics: 48 states ban voting for all incarcerated citizens. About a dozen of those states restrict ex-cons’ voting rights even after they have served their prison sentence and are no longer on probation or parole.

Most of the other states make ex-felons wait between two and five years after they’ve completely passed through the judicial system before they can apply for the privilege.

Only two states, Maine and Vermont, do not restrict felons’ voting rights — even if they committed a heinous crime and still live in prison.

Look, before you take out the crying towel, let’s remember that these citizens who have been stripped of their voting rights are in that situation because they put themselves there.

Let’s not forget they were found guilty of committing serious crimes. (The fact that there may be some wrongful convictions involved is a topic for another column.)

But is it fair to disenfranchise millions of Americans from the election process after they have paid their debt to society?

The governor of Virginia thinks it isn’t. In the commonwealth of Virginia one in four African-Americans is permanently banned from casting a ballot due to restrictions on voting rights for those with convictions.

Back in April, Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe signed an executive order that instantly restored voting rights to 206,000 ex-cons who had completed their probation or parole obligations.

It’s worth noting that blacks have overwhelmingly voted Democratic for decades. Virginia is considered a swing state, and McAuliffe is a longtime fundraiser and friend Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton.

Restoring voting rights for 200,000 citizens just months ahead of the November election — voters believed to lean toward the Democratic Party, at that — didn’t sit well with Virginia Republicans.

In July, they took the matter to the commonwealth’s Supreme Court, which ruled that McAuliffe had overstepped his clemency authority in seeking a blank reinstatement of voting rights.

True to the twists and turns of politics, McAuliffe responded saying he will now use an autopen on high speed to issue clemency one case at a time.

Will McAuliffe’s machinations help Hillary Clinton win Virginia in November? Will the newly reinstated ex-convicts actually register and show up to vote? Are officials in other states — be they Republicans or Democrats — engaged in similar politically tinged intrigues? You can bet some are.

And that, my fellow Americans, is how the political game is played in America these days.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >