Pixel Tracker

Monday, March 18 , 2019, 9:09 am | Fair 52º


Diane Dimond: Quentin Tarantino’s Anti-Cop Rant an Unscripted Travesty

Note to Quentin Tarantino:  Shut up.

I don’t ask my house painter to do my taxes. I don’t want my dentist involved in re-designing my bathroom, and I certainly don’t ask my car mechanic to run my website.

Everyone has their strengths in life, Mr. Tarantino, and while you may be a successful director of violent Hollywood films, you are, by no means, an expert on our nation’s police force.

As I recall, your 1992 film Reservoir Dogs featured a terrifying scene in which a cop is tortured, so we already know where you stand.

A little research digs up information showing that you’ve been arrested for shoplifting, done jail time after ignoring $7,000 worth of parking tickets and, more recently, been sued for assaulting a Hollywood producer.

So really, spare us your pontificating about the state of law and order in America.

For readers who may have missed Tarantino’s latest act, let me re-cap.

Tarantino traveled to New York to appear at an anti-cop rally. Standing behind a podium draped with a banner that read, “Rise Up! Stop Police Terror,” he declared to the already agitated crowd that cops are “murderers.”

“When I see murders, I do not stand by,” he roared. “I have to call the murderers the murderers!”

Tarantino also chose to repeat incorrect facts about the 2014 shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., the episode that galvanized the Black Lives Matter movement. He told the rapt crowd that Brown had “tried to run away” from police Officer Darren Wilson when, in fact, the most reliable grand jury witnesses testified that Brown was “charging” the officer when he was shot.

Furthermore, there was no credible evidence that the teen ever threw up his arms and cried, “Don’t shoot.” Those conclusions were not disputed by the Justice Department, which refused to charge Wilson.

Facts be damned if you’re writing a Hollywood script, but this is serious, real, life-and-death business.

Tarantino’s rabble-rousing display against law enforcement came as New York City was in mourning for police Officer Randolph Holder, 33, shot in the head just three days earlier. Holder, a third-generation officer, had responded to a report of shots fired and was killed as he pursued the suspect, a career criminal with 28 arrests on his rap sheet.

Holder was the fourth NYPD officer killed in the last 11 months. These officers were murdered in cold blood while working to keep the rest of us safe.

As they say in Hollywood, timing is everything, and Tarantino’s timing couldn’t have been worse.

“Shame on him,” NYPD Police Commissioner Bill Bratton told a local radio show. “There are no words to describe the contempt I have for him and his comments at this particular time.”

Patrick Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, is among those now promising to boycott all Tarantino films.

“It’s no surprise that someone who makes a living glorifying crime and violence is a cop-hater, too,” Lynch said.

Cops across the country have joined the Tarantino boycott.

To be clear, I’m not one of those who thinks celebrities should just “shut up and sing” — or act or dance or whatever it is they do. All of us have the right to express an opinion on, say, who they support for president. That’s citizenship in action.

It is wonderful when singer Bono pushes for AIDS assistance for Africa or actor George Clooney campaigns to raise awareness about the crisis in Darfur. When Angelina Jolie throws her star power behind such causes as helping refugees and wiping out global poverty, it’s terrific.

But what Tarantino did wasn’t anywhere near altruistic. It was deliberately inflammatory and delivered to a crowd looking for a reason to declare war on all law enforcement. In my book, Tarantino very nearly opened himself up to a charge of inciting a crowd to violence.

The bottom line: Next time Tarantino finds himself in need of a police officer — after a burglary at his home or a car accident, or maybe for crowd control at one of his fancy film premieres — he may not be greeted by officers who necessarily feel the need to protect and serve him.

Now that would be an interesting plot twist.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.