Thursday, May 24 , 2018, 5:38 pm | Overcast 63º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Diane Dimond: The Sisterhood Goes Silent About Megyn Kelly, Donald Trump

Say, ladies, can we talk?

What is it with women’s groups in America today? They link arms and proclaim they stand for the empowerment of women of all races, creeds and religions. They demand justice and equality for the female gender. They vow to stand up for the rights and respect of women everywhere.

Then where the heck have they been as presidential candidate Donald Trump tramps all over the reputation of Fox News journalist Megyn Kelly? Not a word of support for Kelly from any of the major women’s groups. Crickets.

Why the silence from organizations built on standing up for women?

“She’s a lightweight ... zippo. ... I have no respect for her,” Trump said of Kelly after their withering confrontation at the first Republican presidential debate. The whiny candidate proclaimed Kelly’s questions to him were “unprofessional” and “mean.”

Really? Let’s examine what the Fox News debate moderator said that ticked off The Donald. And remember, Kelly was part of a trio of journalists tasked with helping America understand the character of the candidates.

“Mr. Trump,” Kelly asked, “You’ve called women you don’t like, ‘fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals’ ... How will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton, who (is) likely to be the Democratic nominee, that you are part of the war on women?”

Seems like a perfectly professional and spot-on question for a journalist to ask someone who aspires to the nation’s highest office. Journalists have been tossing candidates’ own words back at them since before the dawn of television.

Trump tried to laugh off the question, saying he’d only used those awful terms while talking about his favorite female punching bag, comedian Rosie O’Donnell. They’ve been feuding — or more accurately, the bloviating billionaire has been picking on O’Donnell — for about a decade now.

Kelly, being the experienced journalist (and attorney) she is, had her facts ready and quickly corrected the record. She made it clear Trump has trashed other women as well, including at least one he worked with on the NBC show Celebrity Apprentice.

In a post-debate interview with CNN, the man who can’t stop bragging about himself said, when Kelly questioned him, “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her — wherever.”

Everyone with an ounce of sense gasped at the obviously tasteless and sexist comment.

I’m not a shill for Megyn Kelly, but this is a woman of observable substance. Time magazine included her on their 2014 list of the 100 most influential people in the world. She is an educated law school graduate, a mother of three and a highly visible television personality — just the kind of success story we all wish for our daughters.

She deserves respect.

Yet a check of the National Organization for Women’s website shows nary a word in support of their “sister” who fights for equal treatment for women on the national stage.

I couldn’t find any comments of support for Kelly on The Feminist Majority Foundation website. Not a word from the Association for Women in Communications or any other journalism-based groups that I could find.

So, we are left to assume these groups only feel comfortable championing those women who are not affiliated with a conservative television network.

If there’s even a hint the woman might not vote the Democratic Party ticket, she gets ignored. Is that it?

I’ve got news for you, sisters. That strategy puts you straight on the road to extinction.

If groups can only stand up for those with similar political views, they leave a sizable portion of their gender base outside looking in. It adds to today’s schism mentality of “us versus them.” It leaves everyone weaker.

Democratic presidential aspirant Hillary Clinton knows this to be true. It took her a few days to formulate her political response, but she called Kelly’s debate performance “incredibly impressive.”

A woman giving another woman her due, despite their political differences. Classy.

Staying silent while professing to demand equality and justice for all women isn’t just shortsighted and hypocritical — it is stupid.

Diane Dimond is the author of Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case. Contact her at [email protected], follow her on Twitter: @DiDimond, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >