Thursday, May 24 , 2018, 8:45 pm | Overcast 58º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: A Republican, Donald Trump is Coming For Your Guns

The gun lobby has long stoked its constituents with the nightmare scenario of a president who’d swipe their God-given right to own weapons. The National Rifle Association frequently warned that President Barack Obama was “coming for our guns,” and that Hillary Clinton would “come for your guns.”

The NRA cringed at the prospect of a president saying something like this: “I like taking the guns early ... Take the guns first, go through due process second.”

But lo and behold, that’s what Trump said Wednesday.

Since we’re stuck with a regime that’s historically incompetent, malevolent, corrupt and security-challenged, we’ve got to get our laughs whenever we can. And Trump’s gun-grabbing riff, which fell from his mouth during a live TV gig with emissaries from Capitol Hill, fully qualifies as roll-on-the-floor hilarity — if only because of the gun guardians’ subsequent freakout.

In the words of Michael Hammond, legislative counsel for the Gun Owners of America, Trump “has become the gun-grabber in chief ... an enemy of the Second Amendment.”

In the wake of a harrowing domestic event — in this case, the Parkland, Fla., massacre — a president is typically tasked with taking the lead, talking knowledgeably and pushing policy solutions. We were led to believe (though only a minority of voters believed it) that Trump possessed such traits.

But what’s manifestly obvious, as underscored by his summit with lawmakers, is that when Trump is positioned at the crossroads of politics and policy, he is lost.

He sat there, free-associating about gun solutions, “thinking” out loud, seeming at times to endorse various Democratic ideas (raising the age ceiling on sales, maybe expanding background checks, maybe banning “assault” weapons) without actually committing to anything.

The most fascinating moment of the event involved the issue of guns being taken from potentially dangerous people. Vice President Mike Pence mentioned that some states have passed “red flag” laws, which empower the cops to seize guns after obtaining a court order.

As Pence explained, those laws “allow due process, so no one’s rights are trampled ... the ability to go to court, obtain an order and collect not only firearms but any weapons in the possession” of the person who’s certified as dangerous.

That’s when Trump chimed in: “Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court ... I like taking the guns early ... Take the guns first, go through the process second.”

Well. We can only imagine how many articles of impeachment would be drafted if Obama had ever endorsed pre-emptive gun confiscation. Sean Hannity’s head would’ve spun with centrifugal force.

Granted, the Gun Owners of America guy did go ballistic, NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch went on TV to rebuke Trump for “talking about punishing innocent Americans, stripping from them constitutional rights without due process,” and a Republican senator or two got upset.

For instance, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said, “I don’t ever believe there’s a time in this country where due process can be dismissed. Period.”

But mostly, folks in the Republican Party just seemed exasperated — and rightly so, because they know that Trump wasn’t suddenly embracing a radical lefty policy to grab guns. They darn well know, as do we, that whatever Trump says at any given moment is merely symptomatic of the mush between his ears.

As a senior Republican Senate aide told the conservative Weekly Standard magazine, “This is why you don’t do high-stakes, hot-button negotiation on live TV with someone who doesn’t know or care about details.”

And as Tillis said about Trump, “He’s not a legal scholar ... I know you heard the words. I just don’t believe in my heart of hearts that’s exactly what he meant.” Which was tantamount to saying that the so-called leader’s policy beliefs are illusory, that his words have no value.

Another Republican aide told the Weekly Standard, “At some point, someone will tell the president what he endorsed, and it will be like the meeting never happened.”

That sounds about right. By tomorrow someone in Trump media will insist that Trump never actually said it, or that Obama was actually the one who said it.

Unless maybe it was a plan cooked up by Clinton in one of her emails. Some people are saying.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “writer in residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >