Sunday, May 27 , 2018, 6:02 pm | Fair 65º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: Beyond the Beltway, Democrats Are Even Worse Off

We’re all so fixated on what’s happening right now in Washington — where Team Trump, shocked by its own victory, is scrambling to form a government with predictable incompetence — that it’s easy to ignore what’s happening in the states beyond the Beltway.

That’s where the Democrats are getting their butts kicked in ways not seen since the 1920s.

When the dust settles, they’ll control a mere 30 of the 98 partisan state legislative chambers. Their incessant losses at the grassroots level have put the Republicans fully in charge of both legislative chambers in 32 states.

That’s a record high for the Republican Party.

Most state legislatures — at last check, 36 — draw the congressional boundaries for 336 of the 435 districts in the House of Representatives. If Republicans can sustain their state dominance in the 2018 midterms (bet on it), they’ll keep drawing those boundaries in ways that maximize their voters and minimize the clout of Democratic voters — thus perpetuating their majorities in the House.

And if Republicans in the years ahead can raise their state legislative dominance to 38 states from 32, while retaining their congressional power, they’ll be able to ratify their dream amendments to the Constitution.

This is one of the most underreported stories of our era: President Barack Obama’s two wins at the top of the Democratic ticket have masked the party’s down-ballot disasters. In fact, the Democratic Party has been hemorrhaging seats in the hinterlands ever since the 2010 midterms.

Since Obama was sworn in in 2009, Democrats have lost roughly 900 state legislative seats and control of more than half the state chambers they ran at the dawn of that year.

One year ago, a prominent Democratic activist said, “There’s a growing realization that we’ve got to get more serious at the state level.”

Gee, ya think?

The party apparently had “a growing realization,” years after it should have been obvious that Obama’s personal successes weren’t translating to the grassroots.

And despite Obama’s current polling popularity, and despite his recent unprecedented endorsement of 150 state legislative candidates, Democrats got nowhere Nov. 8. They targeted the Florida Senate for takeover; didn’t get it. They targeted the Michigan House and the North Carolina House; didn’t get them. They targeted the Pennsylvania House; didn’t get it.

A party can’t build a solid bench if its legs are weak.

Hillary Clinton acknowledged this in a 2015 interview: “You see the problems, when we don’t have a pipeline from county commissions and school boards and state legislatures all the way up to governors. And it has really hurt us ... we have just been decimated.”

So what’s the problem? Why have Democrats coughed up so many states — where anti-abortion laws and voter ID laws and so many other pet conservative causes have flourished during the last six years?

Clinton, in that interview, offered one reason: “Democrats are really personality-driven.”

In other words, they’re focused on the presidential nominee, they’re top-down instead of bottom-up.

A related reason is that many of the party’s core constituents (minorities, young people, diehard liberals) habitually skip the midterm elections where down-ballot candidates take prominence; by contrast, the GOP’s diehards turn out for the midterms, and the party’s D.C. headquarters has long prioritized state legislative elections, routinely outspending their Democratic counterparts by roughly 2-to-1.

And since many (or most) voters don’t know much about their state legislators, party ID is arguably the most determinative factor.

That’s where Republicans have built a big advantage; at the local level, their party brand is better. Fairly or not, they’re viewed as the party of “low taxes” and “pro-business.”

Working-class whites view the GOP as the party of the little guy, even though Republicans haven’t done jack for the little guy and job-exodus due to factory shutdowns were endemic under President Ronald Reagan.

But nobody ever said that politics is fair. Democrats have long paid insufficient attention to their grassroots races, failing time and again to find the “language that real voters speak in.” So says Democratic activist Jessica Post, who had the thankless task of helming the party’s 2016 plan to win back state legislatures.

In her words, “We have a lot of learning to do about how to go back to our roots ... I think Democrats are in for a long period of introspection.”

Can’t argue with that.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >