Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, December 11 , 2018, 2:44 am | Fair 44º


Dick Polman: Can Megyn Kelly Thrive Outside the Fox News Bubble?

When the news broke Tuesday that Megyn Kelly was leaving the Fox News bubble to pursue a broader audience at NBC, my initial thought was: Who cares? Talking heads frequently switch networks, and Americans increasingly get their news not from TV, but from social media sites.

But Kelly’s imminent move is huge because it’s Kelly. The very fact that NBC covets her polarizing “brand” is vivid evidence of how profoundly the broadcast media has changed since the kinder, gentler era of Uncle Walter Cronkite.

Back then, long before cable news and the Internet, the TV anchorman (always a man) was broadly and implicitly trusted across the political spectrum. In the words of journalist-historian David Halberstam, the anchorman “represented in a real way the American center ... a mass figure who held centrist attitudes for a mass audience.”

But today, the mass audience has been fractured and narrowcasted to the point where it’s difficult to locate even a shrunken American center.

Years ago, a commercial network would never have pitched an eight-digit annual salary to someone like Kelly, whose every utterance infuriates millions of viewers.

But in the current environment, NBC is fine with hiring someone who declared on air (in 45 segments) that the New Black Panthers were a major public menace, and that it was “a verifiable fact” that Santa Claus and Jesus were white (Santa is fictional, and scholars say that Jesus was of Mediterranean stock and looked like today’s average Palestinian).

It’s noteworthy that after the news of her hiring broke, Kelly’s Facebook page was flooded with denunciations from both ends of the spectrum.

That’s de rigueur for any anchorperson in our wildly disputatious nation — Uncle Walter would be shocked — but even more so for Kelly. Left-leaning critics called her a front of right-wing disinformation, and attacked NBC for rewarding her. But right-wing critics called her a fake conservative who’d sold out to the enemy.

Many in the conservative camp have long been mad at Kelly. They fumed when she questioned Donald Trump, during the first Republican debate, about his misogynist history; when she told Newt Gingrich that he needed to work on his “anger issues”; when she confronted Dick Cheney over his horrific Iraq track record (“You got it wrong”); when she tore into a male guest who called paid maternity leave “a racket” (her retort: “What a moronic thing to say”).

They’ve long been ticked off that liberal commentators have praised Kelly as Fox News’ lone “sane” anchor.

Indeed, part of her appeal — at least for those outside the Fox bubble — was that she seemed far more professional than the bloviating mouth-breathers (Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity) who bracketed her evening show. How that appeal, and her polarizing past, translates to NBC is anyone’s guess.

Reportedly, she’ll try to soften her image by launching a daytime weekday show (in her words, “a little Charlie Rose, a little Oprah, and a little me”), but that format has been a graveyard for lots of TV personalities, and it’s debatable that anyone cares to watch her swap celebrity gossip.

She has also been tapped to launch a Sunday evening show to compete with 60 Minutes, but that aging audience seems intractably loyal. She will reportedly join the NBC News team to cover major events, but that ensemble format (and the strong competing egos) could dilute her edgy brand.

But NBC is clearly hoping that Kelly can bring along some of her viewers — notably, Republican-leaning women — and thus broaden its ideological reach.

For a broadcast news division on the cusp of the Trump era, a news division widely tagged as “liberal,” hiring Kelly is probably smart. If she can boost the ratings by asking tough questions with a conservative sensibility, NBC’s money would be well spent.

After Kelly’s recent clash with Gingrich, Trump social media director Dan Scavino tweeted a not-so-veiled threat: “Watch what happens to her after this election is over."

Well, now we know.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.