Wednesday, October 17 , 2018, 9:16 pm | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: Donald Trump Blunders into Y​et Another Impeachable Offense

Forgive my frequent references to President Richard Nixon. It’s just eerie how his impeachable behavior is being replicated by the current con man.

As Yogi Berra reputedly said, “It’s like déjà vu​ all over again.”

For instance: When Nixon decided to thwart the FBI’s probe of Watergate, he farmed out the job to his top henchman, H.R. Haldeman. On June 23, 1972 — forever memorialized on an Oval Office tape — Nixon decreed that the CIA should tell the FBI to lay off. He told Haldeman to set up a CIA meeting, and he said: “They should call the FBI in and say that ‘We wish for the country, don’t go any further into this case, period.’”

That was obstruction of justice. The only difference today is that President Donald Trump didn’t farm out his obstruction job to anybody. He did it all by himself. In accordance with his motto, as articulated during his 2016 Republican convention speech: “I alone.”

During a Feb. 14 meeting — according to then-FBI Director James Comey’s contemporaneous memo — Trump ordered Vice President Mike Pence and Attorney General Jeff Sessions to leave the room so that he could speak to Comey alone.

As Comey later wrote, in a memo shared with associates at the time, Trump asked him to drop the FBI probe of paid Russian propagandist Michael Flynn: “I hope you can see your way clear of letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

After this bombshell exploded, the Trump team predictably insisted that the memo wasn’t “truthful or accurate.” Decide for yourself whom to believe: Comey (who has been writing detailed contemporaneous memos for years), or the sociopathic liar who apparently cleared the room because he didn’t want any witnesses.

If you believe Comey — whose memo will inevitably go public — then you’ll surely be interested in 18 U.S. Code Section 1505, which deals with “Obstruction of proceeding before departments, agencies, and committees.”

The key passage:

“Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter of communication, influences, obstructs, impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States” is guilty of obstructing justice.

After the Comey memo hit, virtually all the Republicans went AWOL. Fox News was so devoid of Trump defenders that it felt compelled to ignore the story entirely — opting instead to run giant headlines about the Clinton Foundation (I kid you not) and the breathtaking news that Tim Allen’s TV show, Last Man Standing, had been canceled.

Perhaps the Republicans are beginning to realize that they’ve lashed themselves to a sinking ship. One Republican lawmaker privately told a CNN reporter on May 16 that the reaction among his colleagues to the Comey news is “Wide-eyed and WTF.”

Jimmy Gurulé, a Notre Dame law professor, former assistant attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, and an ex-Treasury undersecretary for enforcement under President George W. Bush, said, “If the (Comey) allegations are true, President Trump has committed a serious federal crime.”

Myra Adams, a campaign aide to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., during the 2008 presidential campaign and a George W. Bush aide in ’04, said, “Grounds for impeachment are defined by whatever the political market will bear. At this writing, one wonders just how much more the political market will bear after only four months of President Trump, and I say this after voting for him!”

And commentator David Gergen, who advised three Republican presidents (including Nixon), connected the dots on CNN, saying, “I think we’re in impeachment territory now for the first time ... It looks like (Trump) was trying to impede the investigation. He was using his power to do that, and when James Comey didn’t go along with him, when he wasn’t his boy, he fired him.”

The Republican Party’s current fig-leaf defense is basically, “We don’t yet know if this Comey memo is real.” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, is threatening to subpoena it. (Chaffetz, in his “request” letter to the FBI: “If true, these memoranda raise questions as to whether the president attempted to influence or impede the investigation.”)

But the big question is what the Republicans will do if or when they actually see the memo. Will they finally stand up for America and fulfill the oath they took to defend it?

“This is no longer about Trump,” said David Frum, a former speechwriter for the younger Bush. “We know what he is.

“It’s about Congress, and specifically Republicans in Congress. Who are they?”

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.