Wednesday, February 21 , 2018, 8:14 am | Fair 47º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: ‘Fake News’ Exposes Donald Trump’s Swamp Creature

Before we inevitably face President Donald Trump’s next phantasmagoria, let’s briefly pause to celebrate the speedy downfall of a apparatchik of the president. Because it speaks to the resilience of our democratic institutions.

The free and independent press — The Washington Post, partnering with CBS News’ 60 Minutes — reported in great detail that Trump’s choice to head the Drug Enforcement Administration, Rep. Tom Marino, R-Pa., was a drug industry toady who’d worked for two years to undercut the DEA’s efforts to combat the burgeoning opioid crisis.

On Oct. 16, Trump acknowledged that “we’re going to look into the report, and we’re going to take it very seriously.” And the next day, Marino said he no longer wished to head the DEA.

That’s how accountability journalism is supposed to work.

In this particular case, the evidence against Marino was so strong that it prompted Trump to park his pap about “Fake News.” Far from fulfilling his so-called promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington (a promise he broke long ago), he got caught trying to hire another swamp creature, and, amazingly, this time he didn’t respond by digging his hole deeper.

The gist of the story — in case you missed it, amid Trump’s lies about then-President Barack Obama supposedly not calling war widows — is that Marino has long been “a friend on Capitol Hill of the giant drug companies that distribute the pain pills that have wreaked so much devastation around the nation.”

On behalf of those companies, he successfully championed a law that makes it far tougher for the DEA to speedily stop those drugs from getting to the street.

Reportedly, Marino’s law is “the crowning achievement of a multifaceted campaign by the drug industry to weaken aggressive DEA enforcement efforts against drug distribution companies that were supplying corrupt doctors and pharmacists who peddled narcotics to the black market.”

Prior to the law (which Obama signed, so he rates a share of responsibility), the DEA had broad authority to halt drug shipments that it deemed to be an “imminent danger” to a community.

But under Marino’s law, the DEA can’t halt shipments unless it can prove that the drugs pose “a substantial likelihood of an immediate threat.” As a DEA whistleblower told the journalists, “There’s no way that we could meet that (higher) burden ... because ‘immediate,’ by definition, means right now.”

Why didn’t Trump condemn the Marino stories and retaliate in his usual manner? Perhaps it’s because The Post’s story was amplified by the parallel 60 Minutes investigation that reportedly reached more than 13 million viewers, and if there’s one thing Trump respects, it’s ratings.

Or perhaps Trump realized that it was stupid to sponsor someone who’d undercut the fight against opioids — after having reaped a lot of 2016 votes in struggling communities devastated by opioids.

All of which prompts us to ask a few questions:

What can possibly explain the political stupidity of the Trump team — choosing a DEA leader who’d done the drug industry’s bidding, weakening the DEA’s efforts to help the very communities that fueled Trump’s thin Electoral College win? What kind of vetting process produces a Tom Marino?

Thanks to the free and independent news media, the administration’s tone-deaf ineptitude has been exposed anew.

And this latest vetting fiasco fits the longstanding pattern. Trump’s second Army secretary nominee had to pull his name after it was discovered that he’d made a slew of disparaging remarks about gays, Muslims and Latinos. Trump’s first Army secretary nominee, a Wall Street billionaire, withdrew rather than face scrutiny for potentially benefiting from federal contracts.

Trump’s first Navy secretary nominee, a private equity investor, dropped out rather than divest his business holdings. Trump’s first Labor secretary nominee, a wealthy restaurant executive, withdrew his name amid attacks on his labor record (he opposed minimum wage hikes) and his personal hiring practices (he’d employed an undocumented worker).

And, of course, this list doesn’t include notables like Michael Flynn, the short-lived national security adviser who somehow got vetted for that job despite his long track record toadying for Russia.

The good news is that Trump is at least prone to being held accountable. On Fox News Radio last week, he duly lauded Marino (“a supporter of mine from Pennsylvania, I won Pennsylvania”) and said that Marino told him that “if there is even a perception of a conflict of interest, he doesn’t want anything to do with it,” which we can take as Trump’s tacit acknowledgment that The Post and CBS News stories were correct.

Granted, he was back online the next day with his rote rant — tweeting about “so much Fake News” in places like CBS News. “Fiction writers!” — but that’s fine. Bluster is no match for accountability journalism.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “writer in residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >