Tuesday, September 18 , 2018, 9:00 am | Fair 59º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: Is Bill O’Reilly Too Big To Fail?

Fox News, where women work at their own risk in a misogynist culture frozen somewhere in the 1950s, is back in crisis mode.

Nine months after chairman and accused sexual harasser Roger Ailes was forced out, we’re wondering whether accused sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly will be forced out, too.

Don’t hold your breath.

I don’t write much about O’Reilly, although it was fun two years ago to recount his phony boasts of covering a war that was actually 1,000 miles away from his hotel. But now attention must be paid, because his new flap is for the highest stakes. It’s morals versus money.

Advertisers are currently fleeing The O’Reilly Factor, indicating in news releases that they prefer not to be associated with an old-school male chauvinist who has cost his company $13 million to settle sexual harassment claims.

The news about O’Reilly — who allegedly made sexual advances to his five female accusers, and when rebuked, hurt the women’s careers — broke bigly over the weekend, and more than a dozen bailing sponsors have scrambled onto the high road.

Mercedes-Benz is patting itself on the back: “The allegations are disturbing and, given the importance of women in every aspect of our business, we don’t feel this is a good environment in which to advertise our products right now."

Ditto clothing company UNTICKit: “It is important that our corporate partners reflect the same principals of inclusivity and equality upon which we have built our brand.”

Ditto the pharmaceutical company Bayer, which says it “supports a safe, respectful and nonabusive environment for women.”

All very noble. But let’s not get carried away, because the companies are ultimately beholden to the business of making money.

These sponsors are merely shifting their ads to other Fox shows, which means that O’Reilly’s notoriety isn’t costing Fox News a penny. Plus, the network gets most of its revenue from licensing fees paid by cable and satellite operators, so it’s cushioned from any sponsor rebellion.

And if the sponsors truly wanted to take a moral stand, they’d bail on Fox News entirely. After all, the network, which claims to have “zero tolerance” for sexual harassment, just renewed its contract with O’Reilly last year after it paid off female accusers. Unfortunately, the sponsors have shown no interest in cutting the cord completely.

Granted, ad boycotts have worked on occasion. MSNBC nixed the simulcast of Don Imus’ radio show, and Glenn Beck left Fox News after sponsors fled his TV program. But O’Reilly may be too big to fail.

To use the mob’s terminology, O’Reilly is an earner. He makes $18 million a year, which is dwarfed by the bucks his show brings in: $446 million ad-revenue dollars got pumped into Fox coffers between 2014 and 2016. That’s likely deemed to be more important to Fox executives than the sex harassment stuff — like, for instance, the allegation that O’Reilly told one woman to buy a vibrator, and serenaded the same woman by phone with masturbation noises.

By the way, O’Reilly says he has never harassed anyone, that he routinely draws accusers just because he’s famous, and that he and Fox have paid off the women because “I’m a father who cares deeply for my children ... I have put to rest any controversies to spare my children.”

In February 2016 he lost custody of his children, who said they wanted to live with their mother.

Bottom line is, money talks. One Fox source told New York magazine’s Gabriel Sherman (the journalist with the best Fox sources), “The impact of these boycotts can be cosmetic. The feeling is, let’s keep our heads down and hope this blows over.”

Which may well happen. Here’s another remark, from a different source: “We’ve seen this many times in the past. Some of the advertisers that left will come back, and some will be replaced. Life will go on.”

That remark was uttered in 2012 by Michael Harrison, who publishes a talk radio magazine. He was referring to Rush Limbaugh — who, at the time, was hemorrhaging advertisers after he ridiculed a law student, a birth control user, as a “slut” and a “prostitute.”

You may remember that flap. Scores of big-ticket advertisers, from Capitol One to Quicken Loans, said they would no longer do business with Rush. Critics gleefully tallied the boycotters and awaited Rush’s downfall.

Last August, Rush inked a new contract with his overlords at Premiere Networks — for another four years. You get my point.

Perhaps Peggy Drexler, an author and gender scholar, is right when she says that the O’Reilly scandal will ultimately help women — “the more we hear about ... the mistreatment of women in the workplace and anywhere, the more women are likely to band together to hasten that change” — but Rupert Murdoch and his old-boy underlings are fine with Fox’s toxic culture if it works for the balance sheet.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >