Friday, August 17 , 2018, 12:53 pm | A Few Clouds 76º


Dick Polman: Too Sleazy Even for the Donald Trump Swamp

As an unpopular charlatan placed his hand on a Bible (of all things) with the lowest-ever approval rating for an incoming president, and as we gird ourselves for what is likely to be the darkest era since the Vietnam War, we in the voting majority are grateful for whatever small victories cross our radar.

So thank you, Monica Crowley.

At least somebody is deemed too sleazy to splash in President Donald Trump’s swamp. His motley nominees are already infamous for their flagrant abuse of ethical norms, so it’s nice to know that at least some kind of aberrant behavior — in Crowley’s case, shameless plagiarizing of other people’s work — is considered beyond the pale.

It’s even unacceptable to our new leader, who set a low standard in his business life by refusing to pay people for their work.

Granted, the announcement that Crowley, a Fox News talking head, will not be appointed to the job for which she was manifestly unqualified — senior director of strategic communications on the National Security Council — still leaves the Trump swamp replete with creatures.

Random examples:

» Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., nominee for Health and Human Services secretary, bought stock in at least two companies that stood to gain financially from legislation he subsequently sponsored or voted for.

» Rex Tillerson, nominee to be secretary of State, is an ExxonMobil lifer whose friendly ’​tude toward Russian President Vladimir Putin has been good for ExxonMobil.

» Betsy DeVos, the billionaire nomine for Education secretary, has major investments in companies that stand to gain financially from her education policies, and she had a Senate hearing without first completing an ethics report on how she plans to avoid conflicts of interest.

» Andy Pudzer, the Labor secretary nominee, whose ex-wife accused him of domestic violence acts during their marriage.

» Reed Cordish, a new White House adviser who doesn’t need a Senate OK, is being sued in a class-action racial discrimination case.

Jeff Sessions ... Steve Bannon ... You get the picture.

But hey, we’ll always have Monica Crowley — who, by the way, was brought down by a free and independent news media. This narrative has been nearly lost in the cacophony of the past few weeks, but it deserves its noble moment because it shows that the Trump regime is not totally immune to the forces of accountability.

It all began earlier this month, when she was thoroughly busted by CNN for stealing other people’s work — word for word, phrase for phrase — while writing a 2012 book titled What the (Bleep) Just Happened.

Politico and CNNMoney found more examples of her stealing other people’s work while writing her 2000 Ph.D. dissertation.

Naturally, the Trump camp’s first impulse was to lash out at the media: “Any attempt to discredit Monica is nothing more than a politically motivated attack that seeks to distract from the real issues facing this country.”

For a few days, Trump clung to the fig leaf of HarperCollins, the publisher of Crowley’s book. The HarperCollins folks initially stood by Crowley, and Trump’s flacks duly hailed them as “the largest and most respected publishers in the world.”

But that all changed when HarperCollins assessed the media’s revelations and announced, effective immediately, that Crowley’s book “will no longer be offered for purchase until such time as the author has the opportunity to source and revise the material.”

This was too much even for Trump. Without nary a single rant or tweet — about “fake news” or the “dishonest media” or whatever — Crowley was ejected from the swamp. Earlier this week, she declared her sudden disinterest in joining the National Security Council, “after much reflection.”

So put your hands together for a vigilant press. Savor this small victory, which at least shows us that not all ethical norms are dead. Problem is, it still leaves us with a swamp that will not be drained. And to best describe that swamp, I will update the infamous phrasings of our Leader:

Republicans are not sending us their best. Some are Russian doormats. Some are sleazebags. Some are racists.

And some, I assume, are good people.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >