Pixel Tracker

Saturday, March 23 , 2019, 6:55 pm | Mostly Cloudy 64º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: Will the Men in the White Coats Drag Donald Trump Away?

Check out the Constitution’s 25th Amendment. A vice president, working with a “majority of either the principle officers of the executive departments, or of such body as Congress may by law provide,” can remove the president for being “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

Even the craven enabling Republicans would do well to read that provision, because the day may come when they’re finally compelled to acknowledge — in the national interest — that President Donald Trump is dangerously off his rocker.

We’re only a week into this farce, and it’s obvious already. As conservative commentator Andrew Ferguson rightly points out, “the candidate who campaigned as a sociopath shows signs he may yet govern as one.”

The latest reminder is Trump’s alternative fact about the election. At the tail end of November, he said he was robbed of a popular vote victory because millions of people had “voted illegally” for Hillary Clinton.

It was just another baldfaced lie. He had zero evidence of massive voter fraud, just as he’d had zero evidence that President Barack Obama was foreign-born. We figured — foolish us — that Trump, with his attention deficit disorder, would simply forget the lie and find a new one. Which he did.

But now he’s obsessing about it again, marinating anew in his delusion. We should not be surprised. Sick and twisted people do stuff like this.

On Jan. 23, during a bipartisan meeting with congressional leaders, he stated that he lost the popular vote because 3 million to 5 million people voted illegally. He offered no evidence of mass fraud, because there isn’t any.

Then during a media briefing, White House propaganda minister Sean Spicer recited Trump’s alternative fact, and said it was “based on studies and evidence that people have presented to him.”

The media asked: What studies? What evidence? Spicer replied: “Studies and information he has.”

What studies? What information? Trump is apparently still fixated on a November story that was posted on Infowars, a tinfoil-hat website, which declared in a headline: “3 million votes in presidential election cast by illegal aliens.”

Problem is, the story had no evidence. Plus, the guy who runs Infowars has stated on the record that the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre never happened.

But Trump still won’t let it go, taking to Twitter to announce, “I will be asking for a major investigation into VOTER FRAUD.”

Someone in the Justice Department should tell him that illegal voting on a massive scale is impossible to pull off without everyone noticing it on Day One. Someone in Justice should remind him that when Jill Stein sought recounts shortly after the election, his own lawyers wrote: “All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake.”

But Trump wouldn’t listen, because he doesn’t do irony.

A few Republicans have roused themselves to protest Trump’s idiocy.

Mike Huckabee, a big supporter, told Fox Business, “I have no evidence whatsoever, and I don’t know that anyone does, that there are that many illegal people who voted ... I’m not sure why he brought it up.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., had the most substantive rebuke.

“I would urge the president to knock this off ...,” he said. “To continue to insist that the 2016 election was conducted in a fashion that millions of people voted illegally undermines faith in our democracy.

“People are going to start doubting you as a person.”

But, all too predictably, most Republicans reacted as if jelly had replaced their spines. In their lust to enact their long-stymied agenda (throwing people off Obamacare, gutting the EPA, etc.), they’re apparently prepared to indulge Trump’s serial lies and delusions.

His temperament is already a burgeoning issue. The anecdotes are piling up. But what’s most remarkable about a recent Washington Post story about Trump’s first week in office is the ninth paragraph: “This account of Trump’s tumultuous first days in office comes from interviews with nearly a dozen senior White House officials and other Trump advisers and confidants, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations and moments.”

In other words, Trump aides are already leaking like a sieve — to the free and independent press that Trump hates.

So the question is: How long will Republicans indulge Trump before they man up to do their duty? Will they sit silent until he rants us to the brink of a needless war that could get a lot of people killed?

His latest “voter fraud” delusion is merely a toxic appetizer.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.