Pixel Tracker

Saturday, February 16 , 2019, 12:02 pm | A Few Clouds 58º

 
 
 
 

Flaw Leads to Delay For Lompoc Motorsports EIR Certification

City Council pospones action on environmental document on controversial project proposed near Lompoc Airport

The Lompoc City Council late Tuesday night postponed certifying the environmental document for a proposed motorsports park near the city’s airport. Click to view larger
The Lompoc City Council late Tuesday night postponed certifying the environmental document for a proposed motorsports park near the city’s airport. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)

A technical flaw pointed out by a speaker Tuesday night forced the Lompoc City Council to postpone certifying the environmental document for a proposed motorsports park

After hearing from multiple speakers for and against the project proposed for Lompoc Airport land, the council voted 5-0 to recirculate the environmental document. 

An eleventh-hour discovery of a potential significant impact not analyzed in the EIR means a section of the document needs to be recirculated for public comments, officials said more than three hours into Tuesday’s meeting.

“As your legal counsel, I would highly recommend you not certify the EIR,” City Attorney Joe Pannone told the council.

Released in late June, the draft EIR prepared by Meridian Consultants of Westlake Village identifies the environmental impacts of the planned activities at the proposed motorsports park and cites ways to minimize or mitigate significant adverse impacts.

The park proposed by a subcommittee of the Lompoc Valley Park, Recreation& Pool Foundation, calls for the phased development of off-highway vehicle tracks, pit areas, motocross arenas, grandstands, a 1/8-mile drag strip, and a vehicle storage structure.

The draft EIR generated 75 comment letters, a Meridian representative said. 

Dozens of comments — both in support and opposition of the EIR and project overall— also were made during Tuesday night’s meeting. 

“This EIR is inadequate and incomplete,” said Jenelle Osborne, a member of the Lompoc Economic Development Committee and a candidate for City Council.

Chris Hampson from Meridian Consultants talks to the Lompoc City Council about the environmental impact report for the proposed motorsports park. Click to view larger
Chris Hampson from Meridian Consultants talks to the Lompoc City Council about the environmental impact report for the proposed motorsports park. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)

She contended the EIR misinterpreted the Lompoc General Plan Noise Element, leading to a document that does not accurately reflect noise impacts from the proposed park or potential mitigation measures. 

After public comment, Meridian representatives said Osborne’s comment highlighted a potential lack of compliance with the General Plan that would require the draft EIR to be recirculated under the California Environmental Quality Act rules.

"Our analysis demonstrated, as it is, that the noise leaving the site is greater than 60 (decibels) which would exceed the city's noise ordinance," said Joe Gibson, Meridian partner and practice group leader. "In doing so, we should have called that a significant impact. We did not call that a significant impact."

Instead the EIR labeled noise a less-than-significant impact because of measurements taken at the "sensitive receptor site," Gibson said.

The project on the 38-acre site near the Santa Ynez River would create a significant and unavoidable impact to air quality, the EIR noted as the lone serious concern initially cited by the study.

Specifically, the document contends the project would exceed Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District thresholds for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides.

Several significant impacts also were identified as being mitigated to less than significant levels, the report noted. Those include biological resources, greenhouse gas emission, hazards and hazardous waste, public services, traffic and circulation.

In addition to the proposed project, the EIR analyzed alternatives including creating an off-highway vehicle facility only or a drag strip facility only.

Staff and the consultant also noted the council’s certification of the environmental report does not obligate the city to approve the project. 

Earlier in the meeting, the City Council postponed action on a request for another $20,000 for Meridian Consultants for additional costs related to the preparing the environmental document.

A representative of Meridian said the original estimate did not account for controversy sparked by the project. While originally expecting a smaller document, the final project report exceeds 500 pages.

It’s not known whether the recirculation of the EIR will increase consultant’s costs above the $20,000.

Pannone said it’s doubtful if the document can be recirculated and certified before the end-of-the-year deadline tied to a state grant that is providing reimbursement for the city's costs.

“If we can’t, we need to have a discussion with the state to see whether or not they will extend the deadline for the phase one potion which is the CEQA review,” Pannone said. 

Certification of the EIR is one small step in the approval process since the project needs to go through a National Environmental Policy Act review plus the city must work with the Federal Aviation Administration to update its Airport Layout Plan.

Noozhawk North County editor Janene Scully can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >