Monday, March 19 , 2018, 3:34 pm | Fair 67º




Former Haggen Grocery Employee Claims Wrongful Termination

A former Haggen employee has filed a lawsuit against the grocery chain, alleging she was forced out for trying to correct a price-scanning method that systematically overcharged customers.

The complaint was filed Wednesday in Santa Barbara Superior Court, alleging the Bellingham, Wash.-based chain wrongfully terminated and violated labor code by intimidating an employee at a recently converted Haggen store in Carpinteria.

Six former Albertsons and Vons locations in Santa Barbara County were converted to Haggens earlier this year after the regional chain acquired 146 stores from AB Acquisition LLC and Safeway Inc., the entity created when Safeway (owner of Vons) merged with Albertsons.

Bruce Anticouni of Santa Barbara’s Anticouni & Associates filed the lawsuit on behalf of Debra Sukiasian, who had worked at a Safeway or Vons store for 38 years, most recently as a pricing specialist.

According to the complaint, Sukiasian chose to stay at the Carpinteria Vons where she had worked since 2004 through its June transition into a Haggen location instead of transferring to a different Vons.

When the store switched over to Haggen’s price scanning system, Sukiasian noticed a discrepancy.

“From the very first day plaintiff’s store reopened as a Haggens, plaintiff became aware of discrepancies between the prices marked on shelves for items and the prices the price scanner at the cash registers recognized and charged to customers,” the complaint states. “The register prices were uniformly higher than those marked on the shelves.”

Some customers complained, but many didn’t notice the pricing difference, which Sukiasian pointed out to managers as unlawful false advertising.

When her concerns were ignored, she wrote an email in July to Haggen CEO Bill Shaner, who acknowledged the email and said she’d be contacted by the support team.

According to the complaint, the managers who showed up at the Carpinteria store the following day reprimanded her for telling the CEO and asked a manager to find a way to fire her — a fact the manager told Sukiasian.

Although she was of retirement age, Sukiasian planned to work another two years, the complaint said.

Because she was under such stress at work and worried about explaining to future employers why she had been fired, Sukiasian elected to retire instead of being terminated.

Her last day was Tuesday — the same day Haggen blamed its pricing discrepancies and other woes on false retail data from Albertsons in a $1 billion lawsuit.

Since moving into new markets, Haggen hasn’t been able to find footing. The company has cut employee hours, laid off some workers, and is planning to close or sell 26 stores in five states, many of them acquired this year as part of its deal with Albertsons and Vons.

Haggen is also facing lawsuits from a local workers union and a class-action complaint for letting go 14 developmentally disabled employees.

In the latest lawsuit, Sukiasian demands a jury trial and is suing for an unknown amount of damages.

"Haggen was disappointed to learn about this lawsuit and is confident it has absolutely no merit," a Haggen spokesperson said Thursday.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >

Meet Your Realtor Sponsored by Village Properties

Patricia Griffin
"I am very hands on and feel that each transaction is special and different. My clients goals are foremost in what I do to bring about a successful transaction."

Full Profile >